Optimal forecast combination based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition for agricultural commodity futures prices

被引:69
作者
Fang, Yongmei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guan, Bo [3 ]
Wu, Shangjuan [1 ]
Heravi, Saeed [4 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ, Coll Math & Informat, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] South China Normal Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Business Sch, Cardiff CF10 3EU, Wales
[4] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Business Sch, Quantitat Methods, Cardiff, Wales
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
forecast combination; future prices; hybrid model; support vector machine; OIL FUTURES; TIME-SERIES; VOLATILITY;
D O I
10.1002/for.2665
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Improving the prediction accuracy of agricultural product futures prices is important for investors, agricultural producers, and policymakers. This is to evade risks and enable government departments to formulate appropriate agricultural regulations and policies. This study employs the ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) technique to decompose six different categories of agricultural futures prices. Subsequently, three models-support vector machine (SVM), neural network (NN), and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA)-are used to predict the decomposition components. The final hybrid model is then constructed by comparing the prediction performance of the decomposition components. The predicting performance of the combination model is then compared with the benchmark individual models: SVM, NN, and ARIMA. Our main interest in this study is on short-term forecasting, and thus we only consider 1-day and 3-day forecast horizons. The results indicate that the prediction performance of the EEMD combined model is better than that of individual models, especially for the 3-day forecasting horizon. The study also concluded that the machine learning methods outperform the statistical methods in forecasting high-frequency volatile components. However, there is no obvious difference between individual models in predicting low-frequency components.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 886
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[11]  
Chu D., 2014, FINANCE EC, V24, P116
[12]   Fuzzy dual-factor time-series for stock index forecasting [J].
Chu, Hsing-Hui ;
Chen, Tai-Liang ;
Cheng, Ching-Hsue ;
Huang, Chen-Chi .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (01) :165-171
[13]   Forecasting gold futures market volatility using macroeconomic variables in the United States [J].
Fang, Libing ;
Yu, Honghai ;
Xiao, Wen .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2018, 72 :249-259
[14]   A particle filtering approach to oil futures price calibration and forecasting [J].
Fileccia, Gaetano ;
Sgarra, Carlo .
JOURNAL OF COMMODITY MARKETS, 2018, 9 :21-34
[15]  
Gao X., 2014, PRICE THEORY PRACTIC, V366, P85
[16]   Using neural networks for forecasting volatility of S&P 500 Index futures prices [J].
Hamid, SA ;
Iqbal, Z .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2004, 57 (10) :1116-1125
[17]  
Huang W., 2013, ZHEJIANG SOCIAL SCI, V5, P40
[18]   Modeling and forecasting the volatility of petroleum futures prices [J].
Kang, Sang Hoon ;
Yoon, Seong-Min .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 :354-362
[19]   Forecasting copper futures volatility under model uncertainty [J].
Li, Gang ;
Li, Yong .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2015, 46 :167-176
[20]   Multifractal analysis of China's agricultural commodity futures markets [J].
Li, Zhihui ;
Lu, Xinsheng .
2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (ICEED2010), 2011, 5 :1920-1926