High-Definition Chromocolonoscopy vs. High-Definition White Light Colonoscopy for Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening

被引:158
作者
Kahi, Charles J. [1 ,2 ]
Anderson, Joseph C. [3 ]
Waxman, Irving [4 ]
Kessler, William R.
Imperiale, Thomas F. [5 ]
Li, Xiaochun [6 ]
Rex, Douglas K.
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol,Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Richard L Roudebush VA Med Ctr, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Hartford, CT 06112 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Regenstrief Inst Inc, Indianapolis, IN USA
[6] Indiana Univ, Dept Biostat, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
关键词
ASYMPTOMATIC ADULTS; NEOPLASTIC LESIONS; COLONIC NEOPLASIA; FLAT ADENOMAS; CHROMOSCOPY; POPULATION; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1038/ajg.2010.51
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Flat and depressed colon neoplasms are an increasingly recognized precursor for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Western populations. High-definition chromoscopy is used to increase the yield of colonoscopy for flat and depressed neoplasms; however, its role in average-risk patients undergoing routine screening remains uncertain. METHODS: Average-risk patients referred for screening colonoscopy at four U. S. medical centers were randomized to high-definition chromocolonoscopy or high-definition white light colonoscopy. The primary outcomes, patients with at least one adenoma and the number of adenomas per patient, were compared between the two groups. The secondary outcome was patients with flat or depressed neoplasms, as defined by the Paris classification. RESULTS: A total of 660 patients were randomized (chromocolonoscopy: 321, white light: 339). Overall, the mean number of adenomas per patient was 1.2 +/- 2.1, the mean number of flat polyps per patient was 1.4 +/- 1.9, and the mean number of flat adenomas per patient was 0.5 +/- 1.0. The number of patients with at least one adenoma (55.5% vs. 48.4%, absolute difference 7.1%, 95% confidence interval (-0.5% to 14.7%), P = 0.07), and the number of adenomas per patient (1.3 +/- 2.4 vs. 1.1 +/- 1.8, P = 0.07) were marginally higher in the chromocolonoscopy group. There were no significant differences in the number of advanced adenomas per patient (0.06 +/- 0.37 vs. 0.04 +/- 0.25, P = 0.3) and the number of advanced adenomas <10 mm per patient (0.02 +/- 0.26 vs. 0.01 +/- 0.14, P = 0.4). Two invasive cancers were found, one in each group; neither was a flat neoplasm. Chromocolonoscopy detected significantly more flat adenomas per patient (0.6 +/- 1.2 vs. 0.4 +/- 0.9, P = 0.01), adenomas <5 mm in diameter per patient (0.8 +/- 1.3 vs. 0.7 +/- 1.1, P = 0.03), and non-neoplastic lesions per patient (1.8 +/- 2.3 vs. 1.0 +/- 1.3, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: High-definition chromocolonoscopy marginally increased overall adenoma detection, and yielded a modest increase in flat adenoma and small adenoma detection, compared with high-definition white light colonoscopy. The yield for advanced neoplasms was similar for the two methods. Our findings do not support the routine use of high-definition chromocolonoscopy for CRC screening in average-risk patients. The high adenoma detection rates observed in this study may be due to the high-definition technology used in both groups.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / 1307
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Association of Colonoscopy and Death From Colorectal Cancer [J].
Baxter, Nancy N. ;
Goldwasser, Meredith A. ;
Paszat, Lawrence F. ;
Saskin, Refik ;
Urbach, David R. ;
Rabeneck, Linda .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 150 (01) :1-W1
[2]   Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Brooker, JC ;
Saunders, BP ;
Shah, SG ;
Thapar, CJ ;
Thomas, HJW ;
Atkin, WS ;
Cardwell, CR ;
Williams, CB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (03) :333-338
[3]   Flat adenomas in the United Kingdom: Are treatable cancers being missed? [J].
Fujii, T ;
Rembacken, BJ ;
Dixon, MF ;
Yoshida, S ;
Axon, ATR .
ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 30 (05) :437-443
[4]   Detecting diminutive colorectal lesions at colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic versus targeted chromoscopy [J].
Hurlstone, DP ;
Cross, SS ;
Slater, R ;
Sanders, DS ;
Brown, S .
GUT, 2004, 53 (03) :376-380
[5]   Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings [J].
Imperiale, TF ;
Wagner, DR ;
Lin, CY ;
Larkin, GN ;
Rogge, JD ;
Ransohoff, DF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (03) :169-174
[6]   FLAT NEOPLASTIC LESIONS OF THE COLON AND RECTUM DETECTED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION VIDEO ENDOSCOPY AND CHROMOSCOPY [J].
JARAMILLO, E ;
WATANABE, M ;
SLEZAK, P ;
RUBIO, C .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 42 (02) :114-122
[7]   Chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon [J].
Kiesslich, R ;
von Bergh, M ;
Hahn, M ;
Hermann, G ;
Jung, M .
ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 33 (12) :1001-1006
[8]   High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: A randomized study [J].
Le Rhun, M ;
Ccron, E ;
Parlier, D ;
Nguyen, JM ;
Canard, JM ;
Alamdari, A ;
Sautereau, D ;
Chaussade, S ;
Galmiche, JP .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 4 (03) :349-354
[9]   Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology [J].
Levin, Bernard ;
Lieberman, David A. ;
McFarland, Beth ;
Smith, Robert A. ;
Brooks, Durado ;
Andrews, Kimberly S. ;
Dash, Chiranjeev ;
Giardiello, Francis M. ;
Glick, Seth ;
Levin, Theodore R. ;
Pickhardt, Perry ;
Rex, Douglas K. ;
Thorson, Alan ;
Winawer, Sidney J. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2008, 58 (03) :130-160
[10]   Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer [J].
Lieberman, DA ;
Weiss, DG ;
Bond, JH ;
Ahnen, DJ ;
Garewal, H ;
Chejfec, G ;
Harford, WV ;
Provenzale, D ;
Sontag, S ;
Schnell, T ;
Campbell, DR ;
Durbin, TE ;
Nelson, DB ;
Ewing, SL ;
Triadafilopoulos, G ;
Ramirez, FC ;
Lee, JG ;
Collins, JF ;
Fennerty, B ;
Johnston, TK ;
Corless, CT ;
McQuaid, KR ;
Sampliner, RE ;
Morales, TG ;
Fass, R ;
Smith, R ;
Maheshwari, Y .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (03) :162-168