Quality indicators for eye bank

被引:12
作者
Acharya, Manisha [1 ]
Biswas, Saurabh [2 ]
Das, Animesh [1 ]
Mathur, Umang [1 ]
Dave, Abhishek [1 ]
Singh, Ashok [1 ]
Dubey, Suneeta [1 ]
机构
[1] Dr Shroffs Char Eye Hosp, New Delhi, India
[2] Samagra Dev Associates Private Ltd, New Delhi, India
关键词
Eye bank; quality assurance; quality indicator;
D O I
10.4103/ijo.IJO_861_17
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study is to identify quality indicators of the eye bank and validate their effectivity. Methods: Adverse reaction rate, discard rate, protocol deviation rate, and compliance rate were defined as Quality Indicators of the eye bank. These were identified based on definition of quality that captures two dimensions - "result quality" and "process quality." The indicators were measured and tracked as part of quality assurance (QA) program of the eye bank. Regular audits were performed to validate alignment of standard operating procedures (SOP) with regulatory and surgeon acceptance standards and alignment of activities performed in the eye bank with the SOP. Prospective study of the indicators was performed by comparing their observed values over the period 2011-2016. Results: Adverse reaction rate decreased more than 8-fold (from 0.61% to 0.07%), discard rate decreased and stabilized at 30%, protocol deviation rate decreased from 1.05% to 0.08%, and compliance rate reported by annual quality audits improved from 59% to 96% at the same time. In effect, adverse reaction rate, discard rate, and protocol deviation rate were leading indicators, and compliance rate was the trailing indicator. Conclusion: These indicators fulfill an important gap in available literature on QA in eye banking. There are two ways in which these findings can be meaningful. First, eye banks which are new to quality measurement can adopt these indicators. Second, eye banks which are already deeply engaged in quality improvement can test these indicators in their eye bank, thereby incorporating them widely and improving them over time.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 393
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Arora R, 2009, STANDARDS EYE BANKIN, P1
[2]   Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review [J].
Boulkedid, Rym ;
Abdoul, Hendy ;
Loustau, Marine ;
Sibony, Olivier ;
Alberti, Corinne .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (06)
[3]   Report of the Eye Bank Association of America Medical Review Subcommittee on Adverse Reactions Reported From 2007 to 2014 [J].
Edelstein, Sean L. ;
DeMatteo, Jennifer ;
Stoeger, Christopher G. ;
Macsai, Marian S. ;
Wang, Chi-Hsiung .
CORNEA, 2016, 35 (07) :917-926
[4]  
Imai M, 2013, COMMONSENSE APPROACH, P37
[5]  
Juran J.M., JURANS QUALITY HDB
[7]   Turning the tide of corneal blindness [J].
Oliva, Matthew S. ;
Schottman, Tim ;
Gulati, Manoj .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 60 (05) :423-427
[8]  
Toniolo M, 2009, DEV OPHTHALMOL, V43, P70, DOI 10.1159/000223840