A New Socio-economic Indicator to Measure the Performance of Bioeconomy Sectors in Europe

被引:87
作者
D'Adamo, Idiano [1 ]
Falcone, Pasquale Marcello [1 ]
Morone, Piergiuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Unitelma Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Law & Econ, Viale Regina Elena 295, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
Bioeconomy; Socio-economic; Europe; Indicators; Multi-criteria; BIO-ECONOMY; SUSTAINABILITY; POLICIES; ALTERNATIVES; PERSPECTIVES; BIOREFINERY; ASSESSMENTS; BIOENERGY; COUNTRIES; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106724
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The European Commission supports the production of renewable biological resources and their conversion into value added products and bio-energy. A new bioeconomy strategy aimed at promoting a sustainable Europe was launched in October 2018. However, little work has been done to monitor, model and appraise the impacts and developmental trajectories of bioeconomy sectors. To gauge the current sustainability performance of individual European countries, the present study proposes a new indicator - the "socio-economic indicator for the bioeconomy" (SEIB) - to measure the socio-economic performance of bioeconomy sectors. Drawing on Eurostat data and the analytic hierarchy process, multi-criteria decision analysis is employed with the aim of providing a direct comparison between member states (MSs). However, bioeconomy involves a large number of sectors and, therefore, it is useful to propose two versions of this indicator in order also to single out the impact of most innovative sectors: the first version considers all bio-based sectors ("SEIB for overall sectors") while the second version excludes all primary sectors ("SEIB for manufacturing and bio-energy sectors"). The results identify three groups of MSs (virtuous, in-between and laggard) with reference to the European average. Ireland occupies the first position in the ranking, and only three other MSs (Denmark, Portugal and Austria) qualify as "virtuous" countries in both rankings.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   How Do Multi-criteria Assessments Address Landscape-level Problems? A Review of Studies and Practices [J].
Allain, Sandrine ;
Plumecocq, Gaeel ;
Leenhardt, Delphine .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 136 :282-295
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ANAL PROCESS PLANNIN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, STAT DAT
[4]   Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives considering sustainability criteria using the analytical hierarchical process tool [J].
Antonopoulos, I. -S. ;
Perkoulidis, G. ;
Logothetis, D. ;
Karkanias, C. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2014, 86 :149-159
[5]   Competitive Bioeconomy? Comparing Bio-based and Non-bio-based Primary Sectors of the World [J].
Asada, Raphael ;
Stern, Tobias .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 149 :120-128
[6]   Investigating ideal-solution based multicriteria decision making techniques for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Omrani, Hichem ;
Gerber, Philippe .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 116 :247-259
[7]   Sustainable development goal indicators: Analyzing trade-offs and complementarities [J].
Barbier, Edward B. ;
Burgess, Joanne C. .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 122 :295-305
[8]   ON A SHORT-COMING OF SAATY METHOD OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHIES [J].
BELTON, V ;
GEAR, T .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1983, 11 (03) :228-230
[9]   Let us discuss how cascading can help implement the circular economy and the bio-economy strategies [J].
Bezama, Alberto .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (07) :593-594
[10]   Agricultural biogas plants - A systematic analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats [J].
Brudermann, Thomas ;
Mitterhuber, Corinna ;
Posch, Alfred .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 76 :107-111