Ankle-Brachial Index and Ventricular Hypertrophy in Arterial Hypertension

被引:14
|
作者
de Albuquerque, Pedro Ferreira [1 ]
Oliveira de Albuquerque, Pedro Henrique [3 ]
de Albuquerque, Gustavo Oliveira [3 ]
Servantes, Denise Maria [3 ]
de Carvalho, Saskya Meneses [3 ]
Oliveira Filho, Japy Angelini [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Ciencias Saude Alagoas, UNCISAL, Maceio, AL, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Clin Coracao LTDA, Maceio, AL, Brazil
关键词
Ankle brachial index; hypertrophy; left ventricular; hypertension; risk assessment; risk factors; CORONARY HEART-DISEASE; RISK; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1590/S0066-782X2012000100013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a marker of peripheral arterial disease. Very few reports have correlated this index with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), functional capacity (FC) and Framingham risk score (FRS). The objective of this study was to verify the correlation between ABI, LVH, FC and FRS in men with arterial hypertension (AH). Prospective and cross-sectional study of male patients (n = 40) with a mean age of 57.92 +/- 7.61 years and no cardiovascular complications. This population was submitted to ABI measurements, echocardiography (ECHO), exercise test (ET) and laboratory tests. The ABI (right and left) was considered abnormal when the ratio between the highest mean systolic pressures of the ankles and arms was 0.9 or higher than 1.3 mmHg. LVH was identified by transthoracic ECHO and the FC by the ET. Peripheral blood samples were collected to calculate the FRS. Normal ABI values were observed in 33 patients (82.5%), who were included in Group I; seven patients (17.5%) with abnormal ABI constituted Group II. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) at the ECO were 111.18 +/- 34.34 g/m(2) (Group I) and 150.29 +/- 34.06 g/m(2) (Group II) (p = 0.009). The prevalence of LVH was 4% (Group I) and 35.3% (Group II) (p = 0.01), demonstrating a significant difference between the groups. As for the FC in ET, there was no difference between the groups. Regarding the FRS, the mean in Group I was below that in Group II: 13.18 +/- 2.11 versus 15.28 +/- 1.79 (p = 0.019). In hypertensive patients, the presence of LVH defined by the LVMI was more frequent in cases with abnormal ABI, identifying a higher cardiovascular risk.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 86
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ankle-brachial index and peripheral arterial disease
    Lamina, C
    Meisinger, C
    Heid, IM
    Rantner, B
    Döring, A
    Löwell, H
    Wichmann, HE
    Kronenberg, F
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2005, 67 : S57 - S61
  • [2] Ankle-Brachial Index as an Indicator of Arterial Stiffness
    Tasci, Ilker
    Kabul, Hasan Kutsi
    ANGIOLOGY, 2012, 63 (02) : 155 - 155
  • [3] Ankle-brachial index
    Ponka, David
    Baddar, Faisal
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2013, 59 (03) : 270 - 270
  • [4] Ankle-brachial index
    Er, F.
    Erdmann, E.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2009, 134 (40) : 2015 - 2016
  • [5] Ankle-Brachial Index and Peripheral Arterial Disease REPLY
    Grenon, S. Marlene
    Gagnon, Joel
    Hsiang, York
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (05): : 471 - 472
  • [6] Correlation of ankle-brachial arterial index to BPH/LUTS
    Lynch, W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 : 67 - 67
  • [7] Subclinical Peripheral Arterial Disease and Ankle-Brachial Index
    Balta, Sevket
    Balta, Ilknur
    Demirkol, Sait
    Cakar, Mustafa
    Sarlak, Hakan
    Kurt, Omer
    ANGIOLOGY, 2013, 64 (05) : 395 - 396
  • [8] Diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease - ankle-brachial index
    Muehlberger, Dominic
    Ahrendt, Johann W.
    Mumme, Achim
    Hummel, Thomas
    PHLEBOLOGIE, 2020, 49 (02) : 111 - 113
  • [9] Peripheral Arterial Disease and Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index
    Engin, Mesut
    Turk, Tamer
    ANGIOLOGY, 2023, 74 (05) : 500 - 500
  • [10] Reverse correlation between ankle-brachial index and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients on maintenance haemodialysis
    Fu, WC
    Ye, CY
    Mei, CL
    Rong, S
    Wang, WJ
    NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 11 (01) : 9 - 14