Community engagement and social licence to operate

被引:214
作者
Dare, Melanie [1 ]
Schirmer, Jacki [2 ,3 ]
Vanclay, Frank [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canberra, Inst Governance & Policy Anal, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[3] Univ Canberra, Ctr Res & Act Publ Hlth, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[4] Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Dept Cultural Geog, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
public participation; social license to operate; community forestry; social forestry; natural resource management; ETHICAL PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; HUMAN-RIGHTS; RESPONSIBILITY; PRINCIPLES; MANAGEMENT; EXPLORATION; GOVERNANCE; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/14615517.2014.927108
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Achieving 'a social licence to operate' is important for organisations with long time horizons, high exposure to global markets and with a wide range of interested stakeholders. Community engagement is critical to achieve a social licence to operate, but its capacity to influence social licence is not well understood. Using case studies from forestry in New Brunswick, Canada and Tasmania, Australia, this article considers what social licence is, how community engagement plays a role in achieving social licence and how an alternative conceptualisation of social licence may improve the influence of community engagement in achieving a social licence to operate. Social licence is often conceived of as a single licence granted by a 'community'. We argue that social licence is better conceptualised as a continuum of multiple licences achieved across various levels of society. Viewed in this way, we can consider what is needed to achieve social licences at given points along that continuum, and identify the strengths and weaknesses of specific engagement techniques in achieving particular social licences.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 197
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Environmental Bargains: Power Struggles and Decision Making over British Columbia's and Tasmania's Old-Growth Forests [J].
Affolderbach, Julia .
ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 87 (02) :181-206
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, A Literature Review Report to the Gas Industry Social and Environmental Research Alliance (GISERA)
[3]   Social impact assessment and ethical research principles: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part II [J].
Baines, James T. ;
Taylor, C. Nicholas ;
Vanclay, Frank .
IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2013, 31 (04) :254-260
[4]  
Boutilier R., 2011, Modelling and measuring the social licence to operate: fruits of a dialogue between theory and practice
[5]  
Boutilier RG, 2012, INT MIN MAN C MELB A
[6]   Social learning from public engagement: dreaming the impossible? [J].
Bull, Richard ;
Petts, Judith ;
Evans, James .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (05) :701-716
[7]  
Chambers FH, 2003, TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF THE BOREAL FOREST, P113
[8]  
Cornwall A., 2004, PARTICIPATION TYRANN, P75
[9]  
Dare M., 2011, Handbook for Operational Community Engagement Within Australian Plantation Forest Management. Cooperative
[10]   Localism in practice: insights from two Tasmanian case studies [J].
Dare, Melanie .
POLICY STUDIES, 2013, 34 (5-6) :592-611