Explaining the unexpected: efficiency and effectiveness in European decision-making

被引:23
作者
Neyer, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Ctr Transatlantic Foreign & Secur Policy, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
arguing; decision-making; deliberation; effectiveness; efficiency; governance;
D O I
10.1080/1350176042000164280
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The legal output of the EU can easily be compared to an average nation-state and surely surpasses that of any other international organization. Although the EU has neither become a state-like entity nor possesses any powers to coerce member states into compliance, its rules are almost always respected. The EU's comparatively good record in terms of efficiency and effectiveness can be understood as the product of an institutional structure that transforms strategic interaction into deliberative problem-solving. Understood as such, the EU resembles a new type of political order which gives evidence that centralized coercion is anything but necessary for a good policy performance.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 38
页数:20
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J EUROPEAN PUBLIC PO, DOI [10.1080/13501769508407007, DOI 10.1080/13501769508407007]
[2]  
BACH M, 1992, Z SOZIOL, V21, P16
[3]  
Beisheim M, 1999, Im Zeitalter der Globalisierung? Thesen und Daten zur gesellschaftlichen und politischen Denationalisierung
[4]   Non-compliance in the European Union:: pathology or statistical artefact? [J].
Börzei, TA .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2001, 8 (05) :803-824
[5]  
*COMM EUR COMM, 1990, 7 COMM EUR COMM
[6]  
*COMM EUR COMM, 1999, 16 COMM EUR COMM
[7]   Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? [J].
Downs, GW ;
Rocke, DM ;
Barsoom, PN .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 1996, 50 (03) :379-&
[8]  
Elster Jon., 1998, DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRA
[9]   Democracy through strong publics in the European Union? [J].
Eriksen, EO ;
Fossum, JE .
JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2002, 40 (03) :401-424
[10]  
Franck ThomasM., 1990, POWER LEGITIMACY NAT