A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management

被引:106
作者
Haddaway, N. R. [1 ]
Kohl, C. [2 ]
da Silva, N. Rebelo [3 ]
Schiemann, J. [2 ]
Spoek, A. [4 ,5 ]
Stewart, R. [3 ]
Sweet, J. B. [6 ]
Wilhelm, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mistra EviEM, Stockholm Environm Inst, Box 24218, S-10451 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] JKI, Fed Res Ctr Cultivated Plants, Erwin Baur Str 27, D-06484 Quedlinburg, Germany
[3] Univ Johannesburg, CEE Joburg, Ctr Anthropol Res CfAR, Bunting Rd, Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Alpen Adria Univ Klagenfurt Wien Graz, Schloegelgasse 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[5] IFZ Interuniv Res Ctr Technol Work & Culture, Schloegelgasse 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[6] JT Environm Consultants JTEC, Cambridge, England
关键词
Stakeholders; Communication; Dissemination; Methodology; Best practice; Conflict resolution; Stakeholder analysis; CONSERVATION; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1186/s13750-017-0089-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
People have a stake in conservation and environmental management both for their own interests and the sake of the environment itself. Environmental decision-making has changed somewhat in recent decades to account for unintentional impacts on human wellbeing. The involvement of stakeholders in environmental projects has been recognised as critical for ensuring their success and equally for the syntheses of evidence of what works, where, and for whom, providing key benefits and challenges. As a result of increased interest in systematic reviews of complex management issues, there is a need for guidance in best practices for stakeholder engagement. Here, we propose a framework for stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews/systematic maps, highlighting recommendations and advice that are critical for effective, efficient and meaningful engagement of stakeholders. The discussion herein aims to provide a toolbox of stakeholder engagement activities, whilst also recommending approaches from stakeholder engagement research that may prove to be particularly useful for systematic reviews and systematic maps.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GUIDELINES SYSTEMATI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1984, STAKEHOLDER MANAGEME
[3]   Institutional context and reduction of the resource bias in political sophistication [J].
Berggren, HM .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2001, 54 (03) :531-552
[4]   Stakeholder analysis: a review [J].
Brugha, R ;
Varvasovszky, Z .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2000, 15 (03) :239-246
[5]  
Bryson J. M., 2004, Public Manag. Rev., V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1080/14719030410001675722
[6]  
Cottrell E., 2014, Defining the Benefits of Stakeholder Engagement in Systematic Reviews
[7]  
Cramer Carl K, 2008, J Evid Based Dent Pract, V8, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.09.002
[8]   Learning from doing participatory rural research: Lessons from the Peak District National Park [J].
Dougill, A. J. ;
Fraser, E. D. G. ;
Holden, J. ;
Hubacek, K. ;
Prell, C. ;
Reed, M. S. ;
Stagl, S. ;
Stringer, L. C. .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (02) :259-275
[9]  
Enters T., 2000, Forest conservation genetics: principles and practice, P263, DOI 10.1079/9780851995045.0263
[10]   A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences [J].
James K.L. ;
Randall N.P. ;
Haddaway N.R. .
Environmental Evidence, 5 (1)