Evaluation of Columbia, USMARC-Composite, Suffolk, and Texel rams as terminal sires in an extensive rangeland production system: II. Postweaning growth and ultrasonic measures of composition for lambs fed a high-energy feedlot diet

Over 3 yr, postweaning growth patterns and changes in ultrasonic measurements of fat depth (FD) and LM area were assessed for 1,049 crossbred ewe and wether lambs (Ovis aries) produced by mating adult Rambouillet ewes to 1 of 22 Columbia, 22 USMARC-Composite (Composite), 21 Suffolk, or 17 Texel rams and raised to weaning under extensive Western rangeland conditions. After weaning, lambs were transitioned to a high-energy finishing diet in a feedlot, weighed weekly for 13 to 16 wk, and scanned using ultrasound at 2-wk intervals to estimate FD and LM area between the 12th and 13th ribs. Lambs sired by Suffolk rams were 5 to 12% heavier (P < 0.05) at start of test, grew 14 to 22% faster (P < 0.001), and were correspondingly 7 to 14% heavier (P < 0.001) after 90 d on test than lambs sired by rams of the other 3 breeds. At this time, lambs sired by Texel rams were 5% lighter (P < 0.01) than Columbia- or Composite-sired lambs, which did not differ (P > 0.20). Columbia-sired lambs had less FD (8.9 mm) but smaller LM areas (15.6 cm(2)) at 90 d on test (both P < 0.01) than lambs sired by rams of the other breeds (average of 9.8 mm for FD and 16.6 cm(2) for LM area), which did not differ for either measurement at this time. At 60 kg, predicted FD differed among sire breeds (P < 0.001) and were similar for Suffolk- (7.6 mm) and Columbia-sired (7.9 mm) lambs, intermediate for Composite-sired lambs (9.1 mm), and largest for Texel-sired (10.1 mm) lambs. At a BW of 60 kg, LM area differed between all pairs of sire breeds (P < 0.05), and was largest for Texel-sired lambs (16.7 cm(2)), followed by Composite-, Suffolk-, and Columbia-sired lambs (15.7, 14.8, and 14.5 cm(2), respectively). At a predicted FD of 9.1 mm (the boundary between U. S. Yield Grades 3 and 4), the predicted LM area for Suffolk-sired lambs (16.2 cm(2)) was similar (P > 0.10) to that of Texel-sired lambs (16.0 cm(2)) and superior (P < 0.01) to that of Composite- (15.7 cm(2)) and Columbia-sired lambs (15.4 cm(2)). Lambs sired by Suffolk rams were thus equal or superior to lambs sired by the other 3 breeds in growth, FD, and LM area at comparable ages, fatness at 60 kg, and LM area at a FD of 9.1 mm, but inferior in LM area to Texel- and Composite-sired lambs at comparable BW.