How much does climate change threaten European forest tree species distributions?

被引:731
作者
Dyderski, Marcin K. [1 ,2 ]
Paz, Sonia [3 ]
Frelich, Lee E. [4 ]
Jagodzinski, Andrzej M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Dendrol, Kornik, Poland
[2] Poznan Univ Life Sci, Dept Game Management & Forest Protect, Fac Forestry, Poznan, Poland
[3] Poznan Univ Life Sci, Fac Forestry, Poznan, Poland
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Forest Resources, Ctr Forest Ecol, St Paul, MN USA
关键词
climate change; disturbance; extinction; forest management; forest policy; habitat suitability; species distribution model; COMMON GARDEN; ENVELOPE MODELS; POTENTIAL RANGE; INVASIVE TREE; ABIES-ALBA; CONSEQUENCES; IMPACTS; HABITAT; UNCERTAINTIES; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.13925
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Although numerous species distribution models have been developed, most were based on insufficient distribution data or used older climate change scenarios. We aimed to quantify changes in projected ranges and threat level by the years 2061-2080, for 12 European forest tree species under three climate change scenarios. We combined tree distribution data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, EUFORGEN, and forest inventories, and we developed species distribution models using MaxEnt and 19 bioclimatic variables. Models were developed for three climate change scenarios-optimistic (RCP2.6), moderate (RCP4.5), and pessimistic (RPC8.5)-using three General Circulation Models, for the period 2061-2080. Our study revealed different responses of tree species to projected climate change. The species may be divided into three groups: "winners"-mostly late-successional species: Abies alba, Fagus sylvatica, Fraxinus excelsior, Quercus robur, and Quercuspetraea; "losers"-mostly pioneer species: Betula pendula, Larix decidua, Picea abies, and Pinus sylvestris; and alien species-Pseudotsuga menziesii, Quercusrubra, and Robinia pseudoacacia, which may be also considered as "winners." Assuming limited migration, most of the species studied would face a significant decrease in suitable habitat area. The threat level was highest for species that currently have the northernmost distribution centers. Ecological consequences of the projected range contractions would be serious for both forest management and nature conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:1150 / 1163
页数:14
相关论文
共 87 条
[11]   Soil modification by different tree species influences the extent of seedling ectomycorrhizal infection [J].
Dickie, IA ;
Oleksyn, J ;
Reich, PB ;
Karolewski, P ;
Zytkowiak, R ;
Jagodzinski, AM ;
Turzanska, E .
MYCORRHIZA, 2006, 16 (02) :73-79
[12]   Site suitability for tree species: Is there a positive relation between a tree species' occurrence and its growth? [J].
Dolos, Klara ;
Bauer, Agnes ;
Albrecht, Steffen .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2015, 134 (04) :609-621
[13]   Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5 [J].
Dufresne, J-L. ;
Foujols, M-A. ;
Denvil, S. ;
Caubel, A. ;
Marti, O. ;
Aumont, O. ;
Balkanski, Y. ;
Bekki, S. ;
Bellenger, H. ;
Benshila, R. ;
Bony, S. ;
Bopp, L. ;
Braconnot, P. ;
Brockmann, P. ;
Cadule, P. ;
Cheruy, F. ;
Codron, F. ;
Cozic, A. ;
Cugnet, D. ;
de Noblet, N. ;
Duvel, J-P. ;
Ethe, C. ;
Fairhead, L. ;
Fichefet, T. ;
Flavoni, S. ;
Friedlingstein, P. ;
Grandpeix, J-Y. ;
Guez, L. ;
Guilyardi, E. ;
Hauglustaine, D. ;
Hourdin, F. ;
Idelkadi, A. ;
Ghattas, J. ;
Joussaume, S. ;
Kageyama, M. ;
Krinner, G. ;
Labetoulle, S. ;
Lahellec, A. ;
Lefebvre, M-P. ;
Lefevre, F. ;
Levy, C. ;
Li, Z. X. ;
Lloyd, J. ;
Lott, F. ;
Madec, G. ;
Mancip, M. ;
Marchand, M. ;
Masson, S. ;
Meurdesoif, Y. ;
Mignot, J. .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2013, 40 (9-10) :2123-2165
[14]   Where are the wild things? Why we need better data on species distribution [J].
Duputie, Anne ;
Zimmermann, Niklaus E. ;
Chuine, Isabelle .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2014, 23 (04) :457-467
[15]   A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists [J].
Elith, Jane ;
Phillips, Steven J. ;
Hastie, Trevor ;
Dudik, Miroslav ;
Chee, Yung En ;
Yates, Colin J. .
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2011, 17 (01) :43-57
[16]  
Ellenberg H., 1988, Vegetation ecology of Central Europe.
[17]  
Ellison AM, 2005, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V3, P479, DOI 10.2307/3868635
[18]  
Elton C., 1958
[19]   A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models [J].
Fielding, AH ;
Bell, JF .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1997, 24 (01) :38-49
[20]   Rapoport's rule: time for an epitaph? [J].
Gaston, KJ ;
Blackburn, TM ;
Spicer, JI .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1998, 13 (02) :70-74