Prospective Validation of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) Score for Necrotizing Fasciitis of the Extremities

被引:52
作者
Hsiao, Cheng-Ting [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Chia-Peng [1 ]
Huang, Tsung-Yu [3 ]
Chen, Yi-Chuan [1 ,4 ]
Fann, Wen-Chih [1 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Chiayi, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Dept Internal Med, Chiayi, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Nursing, Chiayi Campus, Chiayi, Taiwan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0227748
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score was developed as a clinical decision tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. We prospectively evaluated the performance of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score for the diagnosis of patients with necrotizing fasciitis in the extremities. Methods We conducted a prospective and observational cohort study of emergency department patients with necrotizing fasciitis or severe cellulitis in the extremities between April 2015 and December 2016. The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score was calculated for every enrolled patient. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of cut-off scores of 6 and 8 were evaluated. The accuracy of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results A total of 106 patients with necrotizing fasciitis and 825 patients with cellulitis were included. With an Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis cut-off score >= 6, the sensitivity was 43% (95% confidence interval 34% to 53%), specificity was 83% (95% confidence interval 80% to 86%), positive predictive value was 25% (95% confidence interval 20% to 30%), and negative predictive value was 92% (95% confidence interval 91% to 93%); with an Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis cut-off score >= 8, the sensitivity was 27% (95% confidence interval 19% to 37%), specificity was 93% (95% confidence interval 91% to 94%), positive predictive value was 33% (95% confidence interval 25% to 42%), and negative predictive value was 91% (95% confidence interval 90% to 92%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for accuracy of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score was 0.696 (95% CI 0.640 to 0.751). Conclusion The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score may not be an accurate tool for necrotizing fasciitis risk stratification and differentiation between severe cellulitis and necrotizing fasciitis in the emergency department setting based on our study.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Validation of the laboratory risk indicator for necrotising fasciitis scoring system (LRINEC) in a Northern European population
    Al-Hindawi, Ahmed
    McGhee, James
    Lockey, Joseph
    Vizcaychipi, Marcela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2017, 70 (01) : 141 - 143
  • [2] MRI in necrotizing fasciitis of the extremities
    Ali, S. Z.
    Srinivasan, S.
    Peh, W. C. G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 87 (1033)
  • [3] Laboratory risk indicator for necrotising fasciitis (LRINEC) score for the assessment of early necrotising fasciitis: a systematic review of the literature
    Bechar, J.
    Sepehripour, S.
    Hardwicke, J.
    Filobbos, G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2017, 99 (05) : 341 - 346
  • [4] Improvement of a Clinical Score for Necrotizing Fasciitis: 'Pain Out of Proportion' and High CRP Levels Aid the Diagnosis
    Borschitz, Thomas
    Schlicht, Svenja
    Siegel, Ekkehard
    Hanke, Eric
    von Stebut, Esther
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [5] Evaluation of the utility of different scoring systems (FGSI, LRINEC and NLR) in the management of Fournier's gangrene
    Bozkurt, Ozan
    Sen, Volkan
    Demir, Omer
    Esen, Adil
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 47 (02) : 243 - 248
  • [6] Inadequate Sensitivity of Laboratory Risk Indicator to Rule Out Necrotizing Fasciitis in the Emergency Department
    Burner, Elizabeth
    Henderson, Sean O.
    Burke, Guenevere
    Nakashioya, Jeffrey
    Hoffman, Jerome R.
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (03) : 333 - 336
  • [7] The role of contrast enhanced computed tomography in the diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis and comparison with the laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC)
    Carbonetti, Francesco
    Cremona, Antonio
    Carusi, Valentina
    Guidi, Marco
    Iannicelli, Elsa
    Di Girolamo, Marco
    Sergi, Daniela
    Clarioni, Alvise
    Baio, Giulio
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Fratini, Luca
    David, Vincenzo
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2016, 121 (02): : 106 - 121
  • [8] Necrotising fasciitis of the extremities: implementation of new management technologies
    Corona, Pablo S.
    Erimeiku, Frank
    Mercedes Reverte-Vinaixa, Maria
    Soldado, Francisco
    Amat, Carles
    Carrera, Lluis
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 : S66 - S71
  • [9] Fernando SM, 2019, ANN SURG, V269, P58, DOI [10.1097/SLA.0000000000002774, 10.1097/sla.0000000000002774]
  • [10] Analysis of the increasing prevalence of necrotising fasciitis referrals to a regional plastic surgery unit: A retrospective case series
    Hodgins, N.
    Damkat-Thomas, L.
    Shamsian, N.
    Yew, P.
    Lewis, H.
    Khan, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2015, 68 (03) : 304 - 311