On the economics of carbon pricing: Insights from econometric modeling with industry-level data

被引:30
作者
Lin, Boqiang [1 ]
Wesseh, Presley K., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Energy Econ & Energy Polic, Sch Management, China Inst Studies Energy Policy, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon pricing; Innovation input; Innovation output; Energy consumption; China; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INSTRUMENTAL-VARIABLE ESTIMATION; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; INNOVATION ACTIVITIES; PANEL-DATA; CHINA; INTENSITY; EMISSIONS; DECOMPOSITION; PERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104678
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The literature which tests the Porter hypothesis by studying the role of environmental policies on innovation is not only fragmented, but mostly employs broad measures of environmental regulations. In order to draw consensus in this literature and sufficiently incentivize the pursuit of environmental policy objectives, further contributions on the economics of environmental regulations utilizing alternative methods and data are needed. Therefore, our analysis takes the Chinese national emission trading scheme (ETS) as specific example of such a policy. In the econometric analysis, Chinese carbon prices from this market are used and their impact on innovation is tested using a dynamic panel data regression. The main findings are that while a carbon price appears to stimulate R&D intensity (innovation input), the boost in R&D does not result into increased sales and profits for industries (innovation output). High energy consuming industries have higher tendencies to innovate but this takes place at the distribution and marketing stages of the value chain. However, since the energy requirement at these levels is less relative to the actual production stage, the energy costs saving may be limited. Therefore, to better the economics of carbon pricing in a competitive world in which risk aversion is a possibility, policies which encourage energy intensive industries to innovate at the production stage would present opportunities. In general, these findings contribute to our understanding of innovation behavior and have the potential to stimulate new debates in the literature. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Abrell Jan, 2011, BRUEGEL WORKING PAPE
[2]   Linking public support, R&D, innovation and productivity: New evidence from the Spanish food industry [J].
Acosta, Manuel ;
Coronado, Daniel ;
Romero, Carlos .
FOOD POLICY, 2015, 57 :50-61
[3]   Does corporate R&D investment affect firm environmental performance? Evidence from G-6 countries [J].
Alam, Md. Samsul ;
Atif, Muhammad ;
Chien-Chi, Chu ;
Soytas, Ugur .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 78 :401-411
[4]   Symmetrically normalized instrumental-variable estimation using panel data [J].
Alonso-Borrego, C ;
Arellano, M .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1999, 17 (01) :36-49
[5]  
Ambec I., 2006, Energy Studies Review, V14, P42, DOI [10.15173/esr.v14i2.493, DOI 10.15173/ESR.V14I2.493]
[6]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[7]  
[Anonymous], Paper
[8]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[9]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2018, World energy outlook 2018, DOI [10.1787/weo-2018-2-en, DOI 10.1787/WEO-2018-2-EN]