Is the key-treatment-in-key-areas approach in air pollution control policy effective? Evidence from the action plan for air pollution prevention and control in China

被引:24
作者
Wang, Wenhuan [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Congyu [3 ]
Dong, Cong [3 ]
Yu, Huajun [1 ]
Wang, Yutao [1 ]
Yang, Xiaoguang [4 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Fudan Tyndall Ctr, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Sch Publ Adm, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Acad Math & Syst Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
关键词
Key-treatment-in-key-areas; Air pollution control policy; Difference-in-difference; YANGTZE-RIVER DELTA; DIFFERENCE; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; ENERGY; PM2.5; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156850
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The "Action Plan for Air Pollution Prevention and Control from 2013 to 2017 " (APAPPC) establishes the key treatment for key areas in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and its surroundings (BTH), the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), and the Pearl River Delta (PRD) in China. Is the key-treatment-in-key-areas approach effective? Except the targeted pollutants, does there exist the synergistic effects of other air pollutants? Are there differences between the north and the south about the effectiveness of this approach? To answer these new and key questions, this study uses the difference-in-difference (DID) model to evaluate whether it is more effective to implement key treatment policies for two targeted pollutants, PM2.5 and PMcoarse(PM2.5-PM10), and verifies the synergistic emission-reduction effects of the policies on eight other emissions: SO2, NOX, VOC, CO, NH3, BC, OC, and CO2. At the same time, the policy effects are evaluated nationwide, in the north, and in the south using data from 2008 to 2017. The results show the following: (1) The APAPPC's establishment of the key treatment in key areas significantly reduces PM2.5 and PMcoarse by 7.25 % and 10.49 %, respectively, compared with non-key areas nationwide. (2) The key-treatment-in-key-areas policy has synergistic effects on six other emissions: SO2, NOX, CO, BC, OC, and CO2. (3) If viewing the north and the south separately, BTH beats other counterparts in the north by a large margin, while there is no significant difference among provinces and/or areas in the south. This margin is much larger than the one between key areas and other provinces nationwide. Therefore, this paper suggests that key treatment policies in key areas should continue to be implemented, especially for cities that have not dropped, but rather increased, their PM2.5 concentrations. Additionally, air pollution goals should incorporate China's carbon peaking and neutrality goals to reduce air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [51] Does the air pollution joint prevention and control policy possess the Porter effect in China -evidence from two perspectives
    Wu, Wenqi
    Huang, Meng
    Lv, Haitong
    Wang, Wenwen
    Zhang, Ming
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 91
  • [52] Impact of Energy Structure Adjustment and Environmental Regulation on Air Pollution in China: Simulation and Measurement Research by the Dynamic General Equilibrium Model
    Wu, Xianhua
    Deng, Huai
    Li, Hua
    Guo, Yiming
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 172
  • [53] Evaluating the impact of carbon emissions trading scheme on Chinese firms' total factor productivity
    Xiao, Jin
    Li, Guohao
    Zhu, Bing
    Xie, Ling
    Hu, Yi
    Huang, Jing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 306
  • [54] YANG W, 2018, ENV DEV, V30, DOI DOI 10.1088/1361-648X/AAC61B
  • [55] Significant decreases in the volatile organic compound concentration, atmospheric oxidation capacity and photochemical reactivity during the National Day holiday over a suburban site in the North China Plain
    Yang, Yuan
    Wang, Yonghong
    Yao, Dan
    Zhao, Shuman
    Yang, Shuanghong
    Ji, Dongsheng
    Sun, Jie
    Wang, Yinghong
    Liu, Zirui
    Hu, Bo
    Zhang, Renjian
    Wang, Yuesi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2020, 263
  • [56] Effects of air pollution control measures on air quality improvement in Guangzhou, China
    Yu, Meifang
    Zhu, Yun
    Lin, Che-Jen
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Xing, Jia
    Jang, Carey
    Huang, Jizhang
    Huang, Jinying
    Jin, Jiangbo
    Yu, Lian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 244 : 127 - 137
  • [57] The driving factors of air quality index in China
    Zhan, Dongsheng
    Kwan, Mei-Po
    Zhang, Wenzhong
    Yu, Xiaofen
    Meng, Bin
    Liu, Qianqian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 1342 - 1351
  • [58] Environmental regulation, economic development and air pollution in the cities of China: Spatial econometric analysis based on policy scoring and satellite data
    Zhang, Guoxing
    Jia, Yuqi
    Su, Bin
    Xiu, Jing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 328
  • [59] Air pollution and control action in Beijing
    Zhang, Hefeng
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Hao, Jiming
    Wang, Xinming
    Wang, Shulan
    Chai, Fahe
    Li, Mei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 1519 - 1527
  • [60] New region demarcation method for implementing the Joint Prevention and Control of Atmospheric Pollution policy in China
    Zhang, Nannan
    Guan, Yang
    Li, Yi-Fan
    Wang, Shuxiao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 325