Is the key-treatment-in-key-areas approach in air pollution control policy effective? Evidence from the action plan for air pollution prevention and control in China

被引:24
作者
Wang, Wenhuan [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Congyu [3 ]
Dong, Cong [3 ]
Yu, Huajun [1 ]
Wang, Yutao [1 ]
Yang, Xiaoguang [4 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Fudan Tyndall Ctr, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Sch Publ Adm, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Acad Math & Syst Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
关键词
Key-treatment-in-key-areas; Air pollution control policy; Difference-in-difference; YANGTZE-RIVER DELTA; DIFFERENCE; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; ENERGY; PM2.5; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156850
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The "Action Plan for Air Pollution Prevention and Control from 2013 to 2017 " (APAPPC) establishes the key treatment for key areas in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and its surroundings (BTH), the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), and the Pearl River Delta (PRD) in China. Is the key-treatment-in-key-areas approach effective? Except the targeted pollutants, does there exist the synergistic effects of other air pollutants? Are there differences between the north and the south about the effectiveness of this approach? To answer these new and key questions, this study uses the difference-in-difference (DID) model to evaluate whether it is more effective to implement key treatment policies for two targeted pollutants, PM2.5 and PMcoarse(PM2.5-PM10), and verifies the synergistic emission-reduction effects of the policies on eight other emissions: SO2, NOX, VOC, CO, NH3, BC, OC, and CO2. At the same time, the policy effects are evaluated nationwide, in the north, and in the south using data from 2008 to 2017. The results show the following: (1) The APAPPC's establishment of the key treatment in key areas significantly reduces PM2.5 and PMcoarse by 7.25 % and 10.49 %, respectively, compared with non-key areas nationwide. (2) The key-treatment-in-key-areas policy has synergistic effects on six other emissions: SO2, NOX, CO, BC, OC, and CO2. (3) If viewing the north and the south separately, BTH beats other counterparts in the north by a large margin, while there is no significant difference among provinces and/or areas in the south. This margin is much larger than the one between key areas and other provinces nationwide. Therefore, this paper suggests that key treatment policies in key areas should continue to be implemented, especially for cities that have not dropped, but rather increased, their PM2.5 concentrations. Additionally, air pollution goals should incorporate China's carbon peaking and neutrality goals to reduce air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [31] Energy consumption, pollution haven hypothesis, and Environmental Kuznets Curve: Examining the environment-economy link in belt and road initiative countries
    Li, Wenqing
    Qiao, Yuanbo
    Li, Xiao
    Wang, Yutao
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 239
  • [32] Trade openness and air pollution: City-level empirical evidence from China
    Lin, Faqin
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 45 : 78 - 88
  • [33] Impact of the coal banning zone on visibility in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
    Liu, Guangjing
    Xin, Jinyuan
    Wang, Xin
    Si, Ruirui
    Ma, Yining
    Wen, Tianxue
    Zhao, Lei
    Zhao, Dandan
    Wang, Yuesi
    Gao, Wengkang
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 692 : 402 - 410
  • [34] Intermediate input imports and innovations: Evidence from Chinese firms' patent filings
    Liu, Qing
    Qiu, Larry D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 103 : 166 - 183
  • [35] Air pollution characteristics and their relationship with emissions and meteorology in the Yangtze River Delta region during 2014-2016
    Ma, Tao
    Duan, Fengkui
    He, Kebin
    Qin, Yu
    Tong, Dan
    Geng, Guannan
    Liu, Xuyan
    Li, Hui
    Yang, Shuo
    Ye, Siqi
    Xu, Beiyao
    Zhang, Qiang
    Ma, Yongliang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2019, 83 : 8 - 20
  • [36] Environmental Kuznets curves: A spatial econometric approach
    Maddison, David
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2006, 51 (02) : 218 - 230
  • [37] Global energy and environmental impacts of an expanding China
    McKibbin, Warwick J.
    [J]. CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2006, 14 (04) : 38 - 56
  • [38] Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China, 2015, MEAS PIL PROGR CHARG
  • [39] Climate agreement and technology diffusion: Impact of the Kyoto Protocol on international patent applications for renewable energy technologies
    Miyamoto, Mai
    Takeuchi, Kenji
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 : 1331 - 1338
  • [40] Need a bag? A review of public policies on plastic carrier bags - Where, how and to what effect?
    Nielsen, Tobias Dan
    Holmberg, Karl
    Stripple, Johannes
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 87 : 428 - 440