Is the key-treatment-in-key-areas approach in air pollution control policy effective? Evidence from the action plan for air pollution prevention and control in China

被引:24
作者
Wang, Wenhuan [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Congyu [3 ]
Dong, Cong [3 ]
Yu, Huajun [1 ]
Wang, Yutao [1 ]
Yang, Xiaoguang [4 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Fudan Tyndall Ctr, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Sch Publ Adm, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Acad Math & Syst Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
关键词
Key-treatment-in-key-areas; Air pollution control policy; Difference-in-difference; YANGTZE-RIVER DELTA; DIFFERENCE; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; ENERGY; PM2.5; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156850
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The "Action Plan for Air Pollution Prevention and Control from 2013 to 2017 " (APAPPC) establishes the key treatment for key areas in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and its surroundings (BTH), the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), and the Pearl River Delta (PRD) in China. Is the key-treatment-in-key-areas approach effective? Except the targeted pollutants, does there exist the synergistic effects of other air pollutants? Are there differences between the north and the south about the effectiveness of this approach? To answer these new and key questions, this study uses the difference-in-difference (DID) model to evaluate whether it is more effective to implement key treatment policies for two targeted pollutants, PM2.5 and PMcoarse(PM2.5-PM10), and verifies the synergistic emission-reduction effects of the policies on eight other emissions: SO2, NOX, VOC, CO, NH3, BC, OC, and CO2. At the same time, the policy effects are evaluated nationwide, in the north, and in the south using data from 2008 to 2017. The results show the following: (1) The APAPPC's establishment of the key treatment in key areas significantly reduces PM2.5 and PMcoarse by 7.25 % and 10.49 %, respectively, compared with non-key areas nationwide. (2) The key-treatment-in-key-areas policy has synergistic effects on six other emissions: SO2, NOX, CO, BC, OC, and CO2. (3) If viewing the north and the south separately, BTH beats other counterparts in the north by a large margin, while there is no significant difference among provinces and/or areas in the south. This margin is much larger than the one between key areas and other provinces nationwide. Therefore, this paper suggests that key treatment policies in key areas should continue to be implemented, especially for cities that have not dropped, but rather increased, their PM2.5 concentrations. Additionally, air pollution goals should incorporate China's carbon peaking and neutrality goals to reduce air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Winter Heating or Clean Air? Unintended Impacts of China's Huai River Policy
    Almond, Douglas
    Chen, Yuyu
    Greenstone, Michael
    Li, Hongbin
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (02) : 184 - 190
  • [2] The State of Applied Econometrics: Causality and Policy Evaluation
    Athey, Susan
    Imbens, Guido W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) : 3 - 32
  • [3] Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States
    Beck, Thorsten
    Levine, Ross
    Levkov, Alexey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) : 1637 - 1667
  • [4] The impact of the "Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan" on PM2.5 concentrations in Jing-Jin-Ji region during 2012-2020
    Cai, Siyi
    Wang, Yangjun
    Zhao, Bin
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Chang, Xing
    Hao, Jiming
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 580 : 197 - 209
  • [5] Cost of economic growth: Air pollution and health expenditure
    Chen, Fanglin
    Chen, Zhongfei
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 755
  • [6] Industrial activity, energy structure, and environmental pollution in China
    Chen, Lei
    Li, Ke
    Chen, Shuying
    Wang, Xiaofei
    Tang, Liwei
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 104 (104)
  • [7] Welfare loss of China's air pollution: How to make personal vehicle transportation policy
    Chen, Su-Mei
    He, Ling-Yun
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 31 : 106 - 118
  • [8] Do environmental regulations of carbon emissions and air pollution foster green technology innovation: Evidence from China's prefecture-level cities
    Chen, Yanyun
    Yao, Ziyan
    Zhong, Ke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 350
  • [9] Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China's Huai River policy
    Chen, Yuyu
    Ebenstein, Avraham
    Greenstone, Michael
    Li, Hongbin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (32) : 12936 - 12941
  • [10] Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence
    Chetty, Raj
    Looney, Adam
    Kroft, Kory
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (04) : 1145 - 1177