Multi-Actor Platforms in the Water-Agriculture Nexus: Synergies and Long-Term Meaningful Engagement

被引:12
作者
Nesheim, Ingrid [1 ]
Sundnes, Frode [1 ]
Enge, Caroline [1 ]
Graversgaard, Morten [2 ]
van den Brink, Cors [3 ,4 ]
Farrow, Luke [5 ]
Glavan, Matjaz [6 ]
Hansen, Birgitte [7 ]
Leitao, Ines A. [8 ]
Rowbottom, Jenny [9 ]
Tendler, Linda [10 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Water Res NIVA, Okernveien 94, N-0579 Oslo, Norway
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Agroecol, Blichers Alle 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[3] Royal HaskoningDHV, POB 8064, NL-9702 KB Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, POB 800, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Agrifood & Biosci Inst, Agrienvironm Branch, 18a Newforge Ln, Belfast BT9 5PX, Antrim, North Ireland
[6] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Dept Agr, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
[7] Geol Survey Denmark & Greenland GEUS, Dept Quaternary & Groundwater Mapping, CF Mollers Alle 8,Bldg 1110, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[8] Escola Super Agr Coimbra, Polytech Inst Coimbra, Res Ctr Nat Resources Environm & Soc CERNAS, P-3045601 Coimbra, Portugal
[9] Univ Lincoln, Lincoln Inst Agrifood Technol, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
[10] Chamber Agr Fed State Lower Saxony, Dist Off Braunschweig, Helene Kunne Allee 5, D-38122 Braunschweig, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
water governance; agriculture; multi-actor approach; engagement; participation; trust; social networks; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; GOVERNANCE; IMPLEMENTATION; NETWORKS; INVOLVEMENT; GERMANY; KEY;
D O I
10.3390/w13223204
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Solutions to current complex environmental challenges demand the consultation and involvement of various groups in society. In light of the WFD's requirements of public participation, this paper presents an analysis of the establishment and development of nine different multi-actor platforms (MAPs) across Europe set up as arenas for long-term engagements to solve water quality challenges in relation to agriculture. The MAPs represent different histories and legacies of engagement; some are recent initiatives and some are affiliated with previous government-initiated projects, while other MAPs are long-term engagement platforms. A case study approach drawing on insights from the nine engagement processes is used to discuss conditions for enabling long-term multi-actor engagement. The perceived pressure for change and preferred prioritization in complying with mitigating water quality problems vary within and among the MAPs. The results show that governmental and local actors' concern for water quality improvements and focusing on pressure for change are important for establishing meaningful multi-actor engagement when concerns translate into a clear mandate of the MAP. Furthermore, the degree to which the MAPs have been able to establish relationships and networks with other institutions such as water companies, agricultural and environmental authorities, farmers, and civil society organizations influences possibilities for long-term meaningful engagement.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Stakeholder Engagement for Inclusive Water Governance: "Practicing What We Preach" with the OECD Water Governance Initiative [J].
Akhmouch, Aziza ;
Clavreul, Delphine .
WATER, 2016, 8 (05)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, OECD Principles on Water Governance, P24
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, [No title captured]
[4]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[5]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[6]   The tree of participation: a new model for inclusive decision-making [J].
Bell, Karen ;
Reed, Mark .
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 57 (04) :595-614
[7]  
Belmans E, 2018, ADV CHEM POLL ENV MG, V2, P23, DOI 10.1016/bs.apmp.2018.03.001
[8]   Stakeholder analysis: Mapping the river networks for integrated flood risk management [J].
Blazquez, Leticia ;
Garcia, Juan A. ;
Bodoque, Jose M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 124 :506-516
[9]   Social capital and governance: a social network analysis of forest biodiversity collaboration in Central Finland [J].
Borg, Riikka ;
Toikka, Arho ;
Primmer, Eeva .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 50 :90-97
[10]  
Borgatti S. P., 2018, Analyzing Social Networks