Development of the SciRAP Approach for Evaluating the Reliability and Relevance of in vitro Toxicity Data

被引:24
作者
Roth, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
Zilliacus, Johanna [3 ]
Beronius, Anna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Swiss Ctr Appl Human Toxicol SCAHT, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Solna, Sweden
来源
FRONTIERS IN TOXICOLOGY | 2021年 / 3卷
关键词
SciRAP; reliability; relevance; in vitro data; data quality; health risk assessment (HRA); HEALTH-RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC-APPROACH; REVIEWS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3389/ftox.2021.746430
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Efficient and successful integration of data generated from non-animal test methods must rely on reliable and relevant data. It is important therefore to develop tools and criteria that facilitate scientifically sound, structured, and transparent evaluation of reliability and relevance of in vitro toxicity data to efficiently inform regulatory hazard and risk assessment. The Science in Risk Assessment and Policy (SciRAP) initiative aims to promote such overarching goals. We present the work to develop and refine the SciRAP tool for evaluation of reliability and relevance of in vitro studies for incorporation on the SciRAP web-based platform (). In the SciRAP approach, reliability evaluation is based on criteria for reporting quality and methodological quality, and is explicitly separated from relevance evaluation. The SciRAP in vitro tool (version 1.0) was tested and evaluated during an expert test round (April 2019-September 2020) on three in vitro studies by thirty-one experts from regulatory authorities, industry and academia from different geographical areas and with various degree of experience in in vitro research and/or human health risk assessment. In addition, the experts answered an online survey to collect their feedback about the general features and desired characteristics of the tool for further refinement. The SciRAP in vitro tool (version 2.0) was revised based on the outcome of the expert test round (study evaluation and online survey) and consists of 24 criteria for evaluating "reporting quality" (reliability), 16 criteria for "methodological quality" (reliability), and 4 items for evaluating relevance of in vitro studies. Participants were generally positive about the adequacy, flexibility, and user-friendliness of the tool. The expert test round outlined the need to (i) revise the formulation of certain criteria; (ii) provide new or revised accompanying guidance for reporting quality and methodological quality criteria in the "test compounds and controls," "test system," and "data collection and analysis" domains; and (iii) provide revised guidance for relevance items, as general measures to reduce inter-expert variability. The SciRAP in vitro tool allows for a structured and transparent evaluation of in vitro studies for use in regulatory hazard and risk assessment of chemicals.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, National Toxicology Program, (September)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Toxicity testing in the 21st century : a vision and a strategy
[3]   Testing and refining the Science in Risk Assessment and Policy (SciRAP) web-based platform for evaluating the reliability and relevance of in vivo toxicity studies [J].
Beronius, Anna ;
Molander, Linda ;
Zilliacus, Johanna ;
Ruden, Christina ;
Hanberg, Annika .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 38 (12) :1460-1470
[4]   Facilitating the use of non-standard in vivo studies in health risk assessment of chemicals: a proposal to improve evaluation criteria and reporting [J].
Beronius, Anna ;
Molander, Linda ;
Ruden, Christina ;
Hanberg, Annika .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 34 (06) :607-617
[5]   Principles and process for dealing with data and evidence in scientific assessments [J].
European Food Safety Authority .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (06)
[6]  
European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC), 2009, Framework for the Integration of Human and Animal Data in Chemical Risk Assessment
[7]   Quality evaluation of human and environmental toxicity studies performed with nanomaterials - the GUIDEnano approach [J].
Fernandez-Cruz, M. L. ;
Hernandez-Moreno, D. ;
Catalan, J. ;
Cross, R. K. ;
Stockmann-Juvala, H. ;
Cabellos, J. ;
Lopes, Viviana R. ;
Matzke, M. ;
Ferraz, N. ;
Izquierdo, J. J. ;
Navas, J. M. ;
Park, M. ;
Svendsen, C. ;
Janer, G. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO, 2018, 5 (02) :381-397
[8]   Toward Good In Vitro Reporting Standards [J].
Hartung, Thomas ;
de Vries, Rob ;
Hoffmann, Sebastian ;
Hogberg, Helena T. ;
Smirnova, Lena ;
Tsaioun, Katya ;
Whaley, Paul ;
Leist, Marcel .
ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2019, 36 (01) :3-17
[9]   LESSONS LEARNED FROM ALTERNATIVE METHODS AND THEIR VALIDATION FOR A NEW TOXICOLOGY IN THE 21ST CENTURY [J].
Hartung, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART B-CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2010, 13 (2-4) :277-290
[10]   A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology [J].
Hoffmann, Sebastian ;
de Vries, Rob B. M. ;
Stephens, Martin L. ;
Beck, Nancy B. ;
Dirven, Hubert A. A. M. ;
Fowle, John R., III ;
Goodman, Julie E. ;
Hartung, Thomas ;
Kimber, Ian ;
Lalu, Manoj M. ;
Thayer, Kristina ;
Whaley, Paul ;
Wikoff, Daniele ;
Tsaioun, Katya .
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 91 (07) :2551-2575