Applying the Integration Dimensions of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Education Policy Research: Lessons Learned From Investigating Micro Policymaking in Norwegian Schools

被引:0
作者
Gunnulfsen, Ann Elisabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Fac Educ Sci, Dept Teacher Educ & Sch Res, Moltke Moes Vei 35, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
关键词
mixed methods; integration; multiphase; educational policy; rationale dimension; MIXED-METHODS-RESEARCH; LEADERS; DESIGNS;
D O I
10.1177/16094069211028349
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Qualitative research methods have been predominantly used to understand the complex phenomenon of educational policy enactment at the school level. This article contributes to the field of mixed methods research by applying three dimensions of integration-rationale, study purpose, and research design-to the study of micro-policymaking in schools. By examining these three dimensions, this article contributes to the limited body of mixed-methods models in this field. The findings show that the mixed methods approach provides unique insights into education policy scholarship, thus broadening the understanding of the relations and purposes of accountability and control in education.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Designing and conducting mixed methods research
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, MIXED METHODS SOCIAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, KVALITATIVA FORSKNIN
[4]  
Ary D., 1990, INTRO RES ED
[5]  
Ball S.J., 2012, MICROPOLITICS SCH TH
[6]  
Ball S.J., 2008, ED DEBATE
[7]  
Ball S.J., 2012, How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools/by Meg Maguire, Stephen J Ball, and Annette Braun with Kate Hoskins and Jane Perryman
[8]  
Bowe R., 1992, Reforming education and changing schools: Case studies in policy sociology, V10
[9]  
Bryman A., 2016, Social research methods
[10]   Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research [J].
Bryman, Alan .
JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2007, 1 (01) :8-22