Interplay among technical, socio-emotional and personal factors in written feedback research

被引:12
作者
Chong, Ivan [1 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ Hong Kong, Sch Educ & Languages, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Feedback; assessment; higher education; technical factors; socio-emotional factors; personal factors; SELF-EFFICACY; STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK; COMPOSING PROCESSES; TEACHER FEEDBACK; ESL STUDENTS; MOTIVATION; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2017.1317712
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The centrality of written feedback is clearly seen from the proliferation of research in the context of higher education. As an increasingly expanding field in research, the majority of written feedback studies have been interested in investigating the technical aspect of how feedback should be given in order to promote student learning. More recently, researchers have focused on the socio-emotional factors at work in the feedback process, and advocated a dialogic approach to giving feedback in order to increase students' understanding and active participation in the process. Moreover, to empower students to reflect on and make sense of the written feedback they receive, students' personal characteristics, such as their prior and current knowledge, also play an important role. Nevertheless, reviewing studies on written feedback in the context of higher education shows a lopsided focus on the technical factors of written feedback, with little attention paid to the socio-emotional and student factors. This commentary aims at providing a broader definition of written feedback and identifying the dominant factors reported in research. A conceptual framework for looking into the factors at work in the feedback process is proposed and future research directions are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 196
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, THESIS
[2]  
Apter M.J., 1989, Reversal theory: Motivation, emotion and personality
[3]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[4]   THE EXPLANATORY AND PREDICTIVE SCOPE OF SELF-EFFICACY THEORY [J].
BANDURA, A .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 4 (03) :359-373
[5]   Reconceptualising assessment feedback: a key to improving student learning? [J].
Beaumont, Chris ;
O'Doherty, Michelle ;
Shannon, Lee .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (06) :671-687
[6]   Promoting reflection in professional courses: the challenge of context [J].
Boud, D ;
Walker, D .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1998, 23 (02) :191-206
[7]  
Boud D., 2000, STUD CONTIN EDUC, V22, P151
[8]  
Boud D., 2013, FEEDBACK HIGHER PROF
[10]   Differing perceptions in the feedback process [J].
Carless, D .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 31 (02) :219-233