Robust group analysis using outlier inference

被引:408
作者
Woolrich, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, John Radcliffe Hosp, Oxford Ctr Funct Magnet Resonance Imaging Brain F, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.042
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Neuroimaging group studies are typically performed with the assumption that subjects used are randomly drawn from a population of subjects. The population of subjects is assumed to have a distribution of effect sizes associated with it that are Gaussian distributed. However, in practice, group studies can include "outlier" subjects whose effect sizes are completely at odds with the general population for reasons that are not of experimental interest. If ignored, these outliers can dramatically affect the inference results. To solve this problem, we propose a group inference approach which includes inference of outliers using a robust general linear model (GLM) approach. This approach models the errors as being a mixture of two Gaussian distributions, one for the normal population and one for the outliers. Crucially the robust GLM is part of a traditional hierarchical group model which uses GLMs at each level of the hierarchy. This combines the benefits of outlier inference with the benefits of using variance information from lower levels in the hierarchy. A Bayesian inference framework is used to infer on the robust GLM, while using the lower level variance information. The performance of the method is demonstrated on simulated and fMRI data and is compared with iterative reweighted least squares and permutation testing. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 301
页数:16
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI
    Beckmann, CF
    Jenkinson, M
    Smith, SM
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 20 (02) : 1052 - 1063
  • [2] Learning the value of information in an uncertain world
    Behrens, Timothy E. J.
    Woolrich, Mark W.
    Walton, Mark E.
    Rushworth, Matthew F. S.
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 10 (09) : 1214 - 1221
  • [3] Bishop CM., 1995, Neural networks for pattern recognition
  • [4] Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis
    Bullmore, E
    Brammer, M
    Williams, SCR
    Rabehesketh, S
    Janot, N
    David, A
    Mellers, J
    Howard, R
    Sham, P
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 35 (02) : 261 - 277
  • [5] Detecting and adjusting for artifacts in fMRI time series data
    Diedrichsen, J
    Shadmehr, R
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 27 (03) : 624 - 634
  • [6] BAYESIAN DENSITY-ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE USING MIXTURES
    ESCOBAR, MD
    WEST, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 90 (430) : 577 - 588
  • [7] To smooth or not to smooth? Bias and efficiency in fMRI time-series analysis
    Friston, KJ
    Josephs, O
    Zarahn, E
    Holmes, AP
    Rouquette, S
    Poline, JB
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 12 (02) : 196 - 208
  • [8] A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images
    Jenkinson, M
    Smith, S
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2001, 5 (02) : 143 - 156
  • [9] Group analysis in functional neuroimaging:: selecting subjects using similarity measures
    Kherif, F
    Poline, JB
    Mériaux, S
    Benali, H
    Flandin, G
    Brett, M
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 20 (04) : 2197 - 2208
  • [10] Diagnosis and exploration of massively univariate neuroimaging models
    Luo, WL
    Nichols, TE
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 19 (03) : 1014 - 1032