Improved Security of SDN based on Hybrid Quantum Key Distribution Protocol

被引:4
作者
Mahdi, Suadad S. [1 ]
Abdullah, Alharith A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Al Mustaqbal Univ Coll, Babil, Iraq
[2] Univ Babylon, Coll Informat Technol, Babil, Iraq
来源
PROCEEDING OF THE 2ND 2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (CSASE 2022) | 2022年
关键词
hybrid key; OpenFlow protocol; quantum key distribution; software-defined networking; transport layer security;
D O I
10.1109/CSASE51777.2022.9759635
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Network programming provides new security solutions for traditional networks. However, software-defined networking still suffers from security issues. An important one is the weaknesses related to the OpenFlow channel between network devices and controller, as the network can be attacked via the OpenFlow channel and exploit communications with the control plane. Our work proposes a solution to provide adequate security for OpenFlow messages in software-defined networks by using a hybrid key consisting of classical and quantum key distribution protocols to provide double security' depending on the quantum's computational complexity and physical properties. To achieve this goal, the hybrid key is used with transport layer security protocol to provide confidentiality, integrity and quantum authentication to secure software-defined network connections between the control and data planes. We experimentally based on the SDN-testbed to show the workflow of exchanging quantum and classical keys between the control plane and network devices in the data plane, and our results showed the effectiveness of the hybrid key to enhance the security of the transport layer security protocol. Thereby achieving adequate security for controller communications with the data plane against classical and quantum computer attacks by conducting security analysis and clarifying the efficiency of the proposal in terms of the average required time.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 40
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Abdullah A. A., 2019, faz. J. Innov. Technol. Exploring Eng. (IJITEE), V8, P4786
[2]  
Abdullah A. A., 2015, MODIFIED QUANTUM 3 P
[3]   OpenFlow Communications and TLS Security in Software-Defined Networks [J].
Agborubere, Belema ;
Sanchez-Velazquez, Erika .
2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS (ITHINGS) AND IEEE GREEN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (GREENCOM) AND IEEE CYBER, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CPSCOM) AND IEEE SMART DATA (SMARTDATA), 2017, :560-566
[4]   A Survey of Securing Networks Using Software Defined Networking [J].
Ali, Syed Taha ;
Sivaraman, Vijay ;
Radford, Adam ;
Jha, Sanjay .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2015, 64 (03) :1086-1097
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INT C GEOINFORMATICS, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-3969-0_45
[6]   Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing [J].
Bennett, Charles H. ;
Brassard, Gilles .
THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2014, 560 :7-11
[7]  
Chen L., 2016, Report on Post-Quantum Cryptography
[8]   Quantum cryptography [J].
Gisin, N ;
Ribordy, GG ;
Tittel, W ;
Zbinden, H .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2002, 74 (01) :145-195
[9]  
Goransson P, 2016, Software defined networks: a comprehensive approach
[10]  
Gupta V., 2018, NEXTGENERATION NETWO, V638, P147, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-6005-2_16