共 34 条
Three-dimensional analysis for quantification of knee joint space width with weight-bearing CT: comparison with non-weight-bearing CT and weight-bearing radiography
被引:20
作者:
Fritz, B.
[1
,2
]
Fritz, J.
[3
]
Fucentese, S. F.
[2
,4
]
Pfirrmann, C. W. A.
[1
,2
]
Sutter, R.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Balgrist Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Fac Med, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[4] Balgrist Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词:
Cone-beam computed tomography;
Weight-bearing;
Knee joint;
Osteoarthritis;
3-D imaging;
CONE-BEAM CT;
OSTEOARTHRITIS;
AGREEMENT;
RELIABILITY;
CARTILAGE;
SYSTEM;
D O I:
10.1016/j.joca.2021.11.019
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Objective: To compare computer-based 3D-analysis for quantification of the femorotibial joint space width (JSW) using weight-bearing cone beam CT (WB-CT), non-weight-bearing multi-detector CT (NWB-CT), and weight-bearing conventional radiographs (WB-XR). Design: Twenty-six participants prospectively underwent NWB-CT, WB-CT, and WB-XR of the knee. For WB-CT and NWB-CT, the average and minimal JSW was quantified by 3D-analysis of the minimal distance of any point of the subchondral tibial bone surface and the femur. Associations with mechanical leg axes and osteoarthritis were evaluated. Minimal JSW of WB-CT was further compared to WB-XR. Two-tailed p-values of <0.05 were considered significant. Results: Significant differences existed of the average medial and lateral JSW between WB-CT and NWB-CT (medial: 4.7 vs 5.1 mm [P = 0.028], lateral: 6.3 vs 6.8 mm [P = 0.008]). The minimal JSW on WB-XR (medial:3.1 mm, lateral:5.8 mm) were significantly wider compared to WB-CT and NWB-CT (both medial:1.8 mm, lateral:2.9 mm, all p < 0.001), but not significantly different between WB-CT and NWBCT (all p >= 0.869). Significant differences between WB-CT and NWB-CT existed in participants with varus knee alignment for the average and the minimal medial JSW (p = 0.004 and p = 0.011) and for participants with valgus alignment for the average lateral JSW (p = 0.013). On WB-CT, 25% of the femorotibial compartments showed bone-on-bone apposition, which was significantly higher when compared to NWB-CT (10%, P = 0.008) and WB-XR (8%, P = 0.012). Conclusion: Combining WB-CT with 3D-based assessment allows detailed quantification of the femorotibial joint space and the effect of knee alignment on JSW. WB-CT demonstrates significantly more bone-on-bone appositions, which are underestimated or even undetectable on NWB-CT and WB-XR. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 680
页数:10
相关论文