Are we recording postoperative complications correctly? Comparison of NHS Hospital Episode Statistics with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

被引:30
作者
Parthasarathy, Muralidharan [1 ]
Reid, Vicki [1 ]
Pyne, Laura [1 ]
Groot-Wassink, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Ipswich Hosp NHS Trust, Ipswich IP4 5PD, Suffolk, England
关键词
PATIENT SAFETY; ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES; CLINICAL REGISTRY; ADVERSE EVENTS; CLAIMS DATA;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003932
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data are used to measure surgical outcomes, but its quality has been considered inferior to that of clinical databases. We compare the recording accuracy of HES, an administrative database used in the National Health Service (NHS), with that of ACS NSQIP (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program), a well-established clinical database. Methods 1323 patient records from our hospital, common to both databases were compared for ten surgical procedures (amputation, appendicectomy, cholecystectomy, femoral hernia repair, Hartmann's procedure, incisional hernia repair, inguinal hernia repair, long saphenous vein surgery, parathyroidectomy and umbilical hernia repair) and nine postoperative complications (acute renal failure, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, blood transfusion, septic shock, surgical site infection and wound disruption) using text strings or ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases) codes. kappa coefficient was calculated as a measure of concordance between HES and ACS NSQIP databases. Results The databases showed perfect or very good agreement in recording a majority of surgical procedures (kappa coefficient range 0.82-1.0), but there was discordance in recording postoperative complications. When HES was investigated using text string or ICD-10 code, the kappa coefficient range for nine postoperative complications was 0.00-0.56, indicating poor to moderate inter-rater agreement. Concordance was even less when searched by HES coder's recommended way to record postoperative complications. Conclusions HES poorly registers postoperative complications. Suggested improvements include addition of dates when a condition is diagnosed, agreed criteria to identify postoperative complications, specifically trained coding staff for surgery and consistent use of the coding guidance.
引用
收藏
页码:594 / 602
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: Results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [J].
Best, WR ;
Khuri, SF ;
Phelan, M ;
Hur, K ;
Henderson, WG ;
Demakis, JG ;
Daley, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2002, 194 (03) :257-266
[2]   How best to measure surgical quality? comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution [J].
Cima, Robert R. ;
Lackore, Kandace A. ;
Nehring, Sharon A. ;
Cassivi, Stephen D. ;
Donohue, John H. ;
Deschamps, Claude ;
VanSuch, Monica ;
Naessens, James M. .
SURGERY, 2011, 150 (05) :943-949
[3]   Assessing Surgical Quality Using Administrative and Clinical Data Sets: A Direct Comparison of the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data Set [J].
Davenport, Daniel L. ;
Holsapple, Clyde W. ;
Conigliaro, Joseph .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2009, 24 (05) :395-402
[4]   Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to Improve Surgical Outcomes [J].
Guillamondegui, Oscar D. ;
Gunter, Oliver L. ;
Hines, Leonard ;
Martin, Barbara J. ;
Gibson, William ;
Clarke, P. Chris ;
Cecil, William T. ;
Cofer, Joseph B. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 214 (04) :709-714
[5]   Does Surgical Quality Improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program An Evaluation of All Participating Hospitals [J].
Hall, Bruce L. ;
Hamilton, Barton H. ;
Richards, Karen ;
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Cohen, Mark E. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (03) :363-376
[6]   CLINICAL VERSUS ADMINISTRATIVE DATA-BASES FOR CABG SURGERY - DOES IT MATTER [J].
HANNAN, EL ;
KILBURN, H ;
LINDSEY, ML ;
LEWIS, R .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (10) :892-907
[7]  
Ingraham Angela M, 2010, Adv Surg, V44, P251
[8]   Successful implementation of the department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: The patient safety in surgery study [J].
Khuri, Shukri F. ;
Henderson, William G. ;
Daley, Jennifer ;
Jonasson, Olga ;
Jones, R. Scott ;
Campbell, Darrell A., Jr. ;
Fink, Aaron S. ;
Mentzer, Robert M., Jr. ;
Neumayer, Leigh ;
Hammermeister, Karl ;
Mosca, Cecilia ;
Healey, Nancy .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (02) :329-336
[9]   The patient safety in surgery study [J].
Khuri, Shukri F. ;
Henderson, William G. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (06) :1087-1088
[10]   What Are the Real Rates of Postoperative Complications: Elucidating Inconsistencies Between Administrative and Clinical Data Sources [J].
Koch, Colleen G. ;
Li, Liang ;
Hixson, Eric ;
Tang, Anne ;
Phillips, Shannon ;
Henderson, J. Michael .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 214 (05) :798-805