Factors that affect scientists' knowledge sharing behavior in health and life sciences research communities: Differences between explicit and implicit knowledge

被引:53
作者
Park, Jongsoon [1 ]
Gabbard, Joseph L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Intel Corp, Santa Clara, CA 95051 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Knowledge networking; Health and life sciences; Bioinformatics; User centered design; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; TASK-ANALYSIS; EXPERIENCES; TECHNOLOGY; CHALLENGES; NETWORKS; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; ACCESS; ROLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.017
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the past decade, the number of knowledge networking platforms has been rapidly increasing, in part to support data intensive and cross-disciplinary research in growing fields such as health and life sciences. To promote knowledge sharing, it is important to understand why scientists want to or hesitate to share knowledge with other research communities. We examined five determining factors (reciprocal benefit, anticipated relationship, reputation, altruism and fear of being scooped) that impact scientists' intention to share explicit and implicit knowledge and built a predictive research model. The proposed model was then evaluated using partial least squares (PLSs) method against 141 valid survey responses. The results suggested that reciprocal benefit and fear of being scooped were significant in affecting implicit and explicit knowledge sharing behavior in health and life sciences research communities. Reputation had a main effect on scientists' intention to share explicit knowledge and anticipated relationship had an effect on scientists' intention to share implicit knowledge. However, altruism showed no main effects on knowledge sharing. We concluded by discussing strategies, derived from analyzing our survey data, to assist user experience practitioners in designing and promoting knowledge networking support in complex scientific domains. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 335
页数:10
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Review:: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:: Conceptual foundations and research issues [J].
Alavi, M ;
Leidner, DE .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) :107-136
[2]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[3]  
[Anonymous], MYEXPERIMENT WEB 2 0
[4]  
[Anonymous], INFORM RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], KNOWLEDGE BASED EXPE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Exchange and Power
[7]  
[Anonymous], J BIOMED DISCOV COLL
[8]  
[Anonymous], ADV DEV HUMAN RESOUR
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2001 P 34 ANN HAW IN
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MODERN METHODS BUSIN