Motor and psychosocial impact of robot-assisted gait training in a real-world rehabilitation setting: A pilot study

被引:20
作者
Fundaro, Cira [1 ]
Giardini, Anna [2 ]
Maestri, Roberto [3 ]
Traversoni, Silvia [2 ]
Bartolo, Michelangelo [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Casale, Roberto [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] IRCSS, Ist Clin Sci Maugeri, Neurophysiopathol Unit, Montescano, PV, Italy
[2] IRCSS, Ist Clin Sci Maugeri, Psychol Unit, Montescano, PV, Italy
[3] IRCSS, Ist Clin Sci Maugeri, Dept Biomed Engn, Montescano, PV, Italy
[4] Habilita Care & Res Hosp, Neurorehabil Unit, Zingonia Di Ciserano, BG, Italy
[5] Habilita Care & Res Hosp, Dept Adv Technol, Rehabil Unit, Zingonia Di Ciserano, BG, Italy
[6] Habilita Care & Res Hosp, Dept Adv Technol, Pain Rehabil Unit, Zingonia Di Ciserano, BG, Italy
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; CHRONIC STROKE; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; PARKINSON DISEASE; WALKING; DEVICES; EXOSKELETON; PEOPLE; SCALE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0191894
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the last decade robotic devices have been applied in rehabilitation to overcome walking disability in neurologic diseases with promising results. Robot assisted gait training (RAGT) using the Lokomat seems not only to improve gait parameters but also the perception of well-being. Data on the psychosocial patient-robot impact are limited, in particular in the real-world of RAGT, in the rehabilitation setting. During rehabilitation training, the Lokomat can be considered an "assistive device for movement". This allowed the use of the Psycho-social Impact of Assistive Device Scale-PIADS to describe patient interaction with the Lokomat. The primary aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the psychosocial impact of the Lokomat in an in-patient rehabilitation setting using the PIADS; secondary aims were to assess whether the psychosocial impact of RAGT is different between pathological subgroups and if the Lokomat influenced functional variables (Functional Independence Measure scale-FIM and parameters provided by the Lokomat itself). Thirty-nine consecutive patients (69% males, 54.0 +/- 18.0 years) eligible for Lokomat training, with etiologically heterogeneous walking disabilities (Parkinson's Disease, n = 10; Spinal Cord Injury, n = 21; Ictus Event, n = 8) were enrolled. Patients were assessed with the FIM before and after rehabilitation with Lokomat, and the PIADS was administered after the rehabilitative period with Lokomat. Overall the PIADS score was positive (35.8 +/- 21.6), as well as the three sub-scales, pertaining to "ability", "adaptability" and "self-esteem" (17.2 +/- 10.4, 8.9 +/- 5.5 and 10.1 +/- 6.6 respectively) with no between-group differences. All patients significantly improved in gait measure and motor FIM scale (difference after-before treatment values: 11.7 +/- 9.8 and 11.2 +/- 10.3 respectively), increased treadmill speed (0.4 +/- 0.2m/s), reduced body weight support (-14.0 +/- 9.5%) and guidance force (-13.1 +/- 10.7%). This pilot study indicates that Lokomat, in a real-world in-patient setting, may have a generalised approval, independent of disease, underlining the importance of the psycho-social framework for patients training with assistive robotic-devices.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Andrich R, 2003, ASSISITIVE TECHNOLOG
  • [2] Effects of robot-assisted gait training on spatiotemporal gait parameters and balance in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled pilot trial
    Bang, Dae-Hyouk
    Shin, Won-Seob
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION, 2016, 38 (04) : 343 - 349
  • [3] A Human-Robot Interaction Perspective on Assistive and Rehabilitation Robotics
    Beckerle, Philipp
    Salvietti, Gionata
    Unal, Ramazan
    Prattichizzo, Domenico
    Rossi, Simone
    Castellini, Claudio
    Hirche, Sandra
    Endo, Satoshi
    Ben Amor, Heni
    Ciocarlie, Matei
    Mastrogiovanni, Fulvio
    Argall, Brenna D.
    Bianchi, Matteo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROROBOTICS, 2017, 11
  • [4] The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study
    Bortole, Magdo
    Venkatakrishnan, Anusha
    Zhu, Fangshi
    Moreno, Juan C.
    Francisco, Gerard E.
    Pons, Jose L.
    Contreras-Vidal, Jose L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 12
  • [5] Bragoni Maura, 2013, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, V92, pe16, DOI 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182a20a34
  • [6] Robotic neurorehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke: psychological well-being beyond motor improvement
    Calabro, Rocco S.
    De Cola, Maria C.
    Leo, Antonino
    Reitano, Simone
    Balletta, Tina
    Trombetta, Giovanni
    Naro, Antonino
    Russo, Margherita
    Berte, Francesco
    De Luca, Rosaria
    Bramanti, Placido
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2015, 38 (03) : 219 - 225
  • [7] Robotic gait training in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: Can virtual reality make the difference? Findings from a randomized controlled trial
    Calabro, Rocco Salvatore
    Russo, Margherita
    Naro, Antonino
    De Luca, Rosaria
    Leo, Antonino
    Tomasello, Provvidenza
    Molonia, Francesco
    Dattola, Vincenzo
    Bramanti, Alessia
    Bramanti, Placido
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 377 : 25 - 30
  • [8] Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now?
    Calabro, Rocco Salvatore
    Cacciola, Alberto
    Berte, Francesco
    Manuli, Alfredo
    Leo, Antonino
    Bramanti, Alessia
    Naro, Antonino
    Milardi, Demetrio
    Bramanti, Placido
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 37 (04) : 503 - 514
  • [9] Eye tracking communication devices in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Impact on disability and quality of life
    Caligari, Marco
    Godi, Marco
    Guglielmetti, Simone
    Franchignoni, Franco
    Nardone, Antonio
    [J]. AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS AND FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION, 2013, 14 (7-8) : 546 - 552
  • [10] Chisari C, 2015, EUR J PHYS REHAB MED, V51, P59