Performance Characterization of Phase Gradient Autofocus for Inverse Synthetic Aperture LADAR

被引:0
作者
Pellizzari, Casey J. [1 ]
Spencer, Mark F. [2 ]
Calef, Brandoch [3 ]
Bos, Jeremy [4 ]
Williams, Skip [4 ]
Senft, Daniel C. [5 ]
Williams, Stacie E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Air Force Res Lab, Directed Energy Directorate, Kihei, HI 96753 USA
[2] Air Force Inst Technol, Dayton, OH 45433 USA
[3] Boeing LTS, Kihei, HI 96753 USA
[4] Air Force Res Lab, Kihei, HI 96753 USA
[5] Air Force Res Lab, Kirtland AFB, NM 87117 USA
来源
2014 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE | 2014年
关键词
RADAR AUTOFOCUS; RESOLUTION; ALGORITHM; IMAGES; ERRORS; PGA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Phase Gradient Autofocus (PGA) is an effective algorithm for estimating and removing piston-phase errors from spotlight-mode synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. For target scenes dominated by a point source, the algorithm has been shown to be optimal in the sense that it approaches the Cramer-Rao bound for carrier-to-noise ratios (CNRs) as low as -5 dB. In this paper, we explore PGA's effectiveness against ground-based inverse synthetic aperture LADAR (ISAL) observations of spacecraft, where the target characteristics and phase errors are quite different than in the SAR case. At optical wavelengths, the power spectrum of the piston-phase errors will be dominated less by platform motion and more by atmospheric variations. In addition, space objects will have fewer range-resolution cells across them than would a typical extended SAR scene. This research characterizes the performance limitations of PGA for an ISAL system as a function of CNR and the number of range-resolution cells across the scene. A high-fidelity wave-optics simulation is used to generate representative test data for input to the PGA algorithm. Emphasis is placed on finding the lower limits of performance for which image reconstruction is possible.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Non-Stationary Platform Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar Maneuvering Target Imaging Based on Phase Retrieval [J].
Shi, Hongyin ;
Xia, Saixue ;
Qin, Qi ;
Yang, Ting ;
Qiao, Zhijun .
SENSORS, 2018, 18 (10)
[42]   Inverse synthetic aperture radar rotation velocity estimation based on phase slope difference of two prominent scatterers [J].
Peng, S. -B. ;
Xu, J. ;
Peng, Y. -N. ;
Xiang, J. -B. ;
Xia, X. -G. .
IET RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION, 2011, 5 (09) :1002-1009
[43]   Atmospheric turbulence induced synthetic aperture lidar phase error compensation [J].
Lu, Tian-an ;
Li, Hong-ping .
OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 381 :214-221
[44]   Maneuvering target imaging and scaling by using sparse inverse synthetic aperture [J].
Xu, Gang ;
Yang, Lei ;
Bi, Guoan ;
Xing, Mengdao .
SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2017, 137 :149-159
[45]   Bistatic inverse synthetic aperture radar imaging method for maneuvering targets [J].
Sun Sibo ;
Yuan Yeshu ;
Jiang Yicheng .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 10
[46]   Synthetic aperture ladar motion compensation method based on symmetrical triangular linear frequency modulation continuous wave [J].
Wang, Shuai ;
Wang, Bingnan ;
Xiang, Maosheng ;
Sun, Xiaofan ;
Xu, Weidi ;
Wu, Yirong .
OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 471
[47]   Parametric scatterer extraction method for space-target inverse synthetic aperture radar image CLEAN [J].
Zhang, Xiongkui ;
Cui, Jing ;
Wang, Junling ;
Sun, Chang ;
Zhu, Zhaokun ;
Wang, Fang ;
Ma, Yan .
IET RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION, 2023, 17 (05) :899-915
[48]   Optical phase imaging using a synthetic aperture phase retrieval technique [J].
Lee, Dennis J. ;
Weiner, Andrew M. .
OPTICS EXPRESS, 2014, 22 (08) :9380-9394
[49]   Multifrequency and Multistatic Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar, with Application to FM Passive Radar [J].
Ginolhac, Guillaume ;
Schmitt, Francoise ;
Daout, Franck ;
Forster, Philippe .
EURASIP JOURNAL ON ADVANCES IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010,
[50]   Rotation Estimation for Wide-Angle Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar Imaging [J].
Zhou, Wei ;
Yeh, Chun-mao ;
Jin, Rui-jin ;
Yang, Jian ;
Song, Jian-she .
JOURNAL OF SENSORS, 2016, 2016