Comparison analysis of current helicity inferred from several solar vector magnetographs

被引:1
作者
Xu HaiQing [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Astron Observ, Key Lab Solar Act, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
关键词
Sun; magnetic field; current helicity; MAGNETIC-FIELDS; ACTIVE REGIONS; FARADAY-ROTATION; TELESCOPE; HUAIROU; MEES;
D O I
10.1360/SSPMA-2019-0087
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Since the 1990s, great progress has been made in study of current helicity in solar photosphere. The statistical results of large samples reveal an important trend of current helicity distribution: active regions in solar surface mainly show negative sign of current helicity in northern hemisphere and positive in southern hemisphere. In this paper. using vector magnetograms from different vector magnetographs, we analyzed the variation of current helicity density h(c) with magnetic field and discussed the reasons for differences among different instruments. We divided longitudinal magnetic field B-z and total magnetic field B into six intervals and calculated h(c) in each interval. The statistical study show that: for B-z was less than 600 G, there was a good consistency of h(c) inferred from different data sets, and h(c) obeyed the hemispheric sign rule (HSR); for B-z was larger than 600 G, the discrepancy among different data sets increased and k disobey the HSR in some B-z intervals; the HSR was better followed in southern hemisphere. The variation trend of h(c) with B was similar to that of B. Using the same method, we studied individual active region and analyzed the influence of magnetic optical effect on helicity calculation. Through the above analysis, we conclude that the calculated helicity parameters are basically believable when B-z is less than 600 G. The real reasons for the discrepancy among different instruments when B-z is larger than 600 G need to be further studied.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Ai Guo-xiang, 1986, Acta Astronomica Sinica, V27, P173
[2]   Improved magnetogram calibration of Solar Magnetic Field Telescope and its comparison with the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager [J].
Bai, X. Y. ;
Deng, Y. Y. ;
Teng, F. ;
Su, J. T. ;
Mao, X. J. ;
Wang, G. P. .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 445 (01) :49-55
[3]   Helicity computation using observations from two different polarimetric instruments [J].
Bao, SD ;
Pevtsov, AA ;
Wang, TJ ;
Zhang, HQ .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2000, 195 (01) :75-87
[4]   The hemispheric sign rule of current helicity during the rising phase of cycle 23 [J].
Bao, SD ;
Ai, GX ;
Zhang, HQ .
JOURNAL OF ASTROPHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY, 2000, 21 (3-4) :303-306
[5]   Patterns of current helicity for solar cycle 22 [J].
Bao, SD ;
Zhang, HQ .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 496 (01) :L43-L46
[6]   THE TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MAGNETIC HELICITY [J].
BERGER, MA ;
FIELD, GB .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1984, 147 (OCT) :133-148
[7]   Helicity of solar active regions from a dynamo model [J].
Choudhuri, AR ;
Chatterjee, P ;
Nandy, D .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 615 (01) :L57-L60
[8]   Starspots, stellar cycles and stellar flares: Lessons from solar dynamo models [J].
Choudhuri, Arnab Rai .
SCIENCE CHINA-PHYSICS MECHANICS & ASTRONOMY, 2017, 60 (01)
[9]   Statistical removal of Faraday rotation in vector magnetograms taken by filter-type magnetographs [J].
Gao, Yu ;
Su, Jiangtao ;
Xu, Haiqing ;
Zhang, Hongqi .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 386 (04) :1959-1965
[10]   FIRST SYNOPTIC MAPS OF PHOTOSPHERIC VECTOR MAGNETIC FIELD FROM SOLIS/VSM: NON-RADIAL MAGNETIC FIELDS AND HEMISPHERIC PATTERN OF HELICITY [J].
Gosain, S. ;
Pevtsov, A. A. ;
Rudenko, G. V. ;
Anfinogentov, S. A. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 772 (01)