Comparison among structured first order algorithms in the solution of the Euler equations in two-dimensions

The present work studies upwind schemes applied to the solution of aeronautical and aerospace problems. The Harten, the Frink, Parikh and Pirzadeh, the Liou and Steffen and the Radespiel and Kroll algorithms, all first order accurate in space, are studied. The Eider equations in conservative form, employing a finite volume formulation and a structured spatial discretization, in the two-dimensional space, are solved. A time splitting method and a Runge-Kutta method of five stages are used to perform the time march of the If numerical schemes. The steady state physical problems of the supersonic flow along a ramp and around a blunt body configuration are studied. All algorithms are accelerated to the steady state solution using a spatially variable time step. This technique has proved excellent gains in terms of convergence ratio as reported in Maciel. The results have demonstrated that the Lion and Steffen scheme has presented the most critical solutions, in both example-cases, in relation to the others schemes and a more accurate solution, in terms of the determination of the stagnation pressure in the blunt body case, than the Harten and the Radespiel and Kroll schemes. In the ramp problem, the Harten scheme predicts the best pressure distribution along the ramp wall in comparison with theoretical results. In the blunt body problem, the Lion and Steffen scheme presents the highest value of Cp at the configuration nose in relation to the other schemes. Values of CL and CD have been accurately predicted by all schemes, except by the Harten scheme.