Can Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prevent Biopsy or Change the Management of BI-RADS® Category 4 Breast Lesions?

被引:1
|
作者
Turnaoglu, Hale [1 ,2 ]
Ozturk, Emine [1 ]
Yucesoy, Cuneyt [1 ]
Teber, Mehmet Akif [3 ]
Turan, Aynur [3 ]
Ozbalci, Aysu Basak [1 ]
Seker, Ebru Gaye [4 ]
Onal, Binnur [5 ]
Hekimoglu, Baki [1 ]
机构
[1] Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Baskent Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Etlik Ihtisas Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Ankara, Turkey
[5] Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Res Hosp, Dept Pathol & Cytol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Breast; BI-RADS; 4; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; Ultrasonography; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; FEATURES; BENIGN; MASSES; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s12262-017-1654-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The BI-RADS (R) category 4 includes suspicious breast lesions which requires biopsy. The aim of this study is to investigate the contribution of breast magnetic resonance imaging to the management of BI-RADS (R) category 4 breast lesions detected by mammography and/or ultrasonography. Thirty-four lesions classified as BI-RADS (R) category 4A, 4B, or 4C by conventional methods were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging. All lesions were coded by using the American College of Radiology BI-RADS (R) lexicon. Each lesion was verified with the result of pathology. Lesions were evaluated as BI-RADS (R) category 1 in 1 patient (2.9%), category 3 (20.6%) in 7 patients, category 4 in 25 patients (73.6%), and category 5 in 1 patient (2.9%) with breast magnetic resonance imaging. Only the BI-RADS (R) 4A lesion categories were changed by breast magnetic resonance imaging, and these lesions were pathologically diagnosed as benign. The negative predictive value of breast MRI for BI-RADS (R) category 4A lesions was calculated as 100%. In all BI-RADS (R) category 4 lesions, pathologically 4 lesions found to be high risk and 3 lesions found to be malignant. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive value of breast magnetic resonance imaging in BI-RADS (R) category 4 lesions were calculated as 100, 29.6, 26.9, and 100%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was calculated 0.648. Breast magnetic resonance imaging is promising to be used as a problem-solving modality in BI-RADS (R) category 4A breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 512
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management for BI-RADS category 3 lesions detected in preoperative breast MR imaging of breast cancer patients
    Gweon, Hye Mi
    Cho, Nariya
    Kim, Soo-Yeon
    Koo, Hye Ryoung
    Seo, Mirinae
    Chu, Ajung
    Son, Eun Ju
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (08) : 3211 - 3216
  • [22] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Subdivide Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) Category 4 Lesions
    Liu, Dandan
    Ba, Zhaogui
    Ni, Xiaoli
    Wang, Linhong
    Yu, Dexin
    Ma, Xiangxing
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2018, 24 : 2180 - 2188
  • [23] Management for BI-RADS category 3 lesions detected in preoperative breast MR imaging of breast cancer patients
    Hye Mi Gweon
    Nariya Cho
    Soo-Yeon Kim
    Hye Ryoung Koo
    Mirinae Seo
    Ajung Chu
    Eun Ju Son
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 3211 - 3216
  • [24] Predicting Breast Cancer in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Ultrasound Category 4 or 5 Lesions: A Nomogram Combining Radiomics and BI-RADS
    Luo, Wei-quan
    Huang, Qing-xiu
    Huang, Xiao-wen
    Hu, Hang-tong
    Zeng, Fu-qiang
    Wang, Wei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [25] Downgrade BI-RADS 4A Patients Using Nomogram Based on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, and Mammography
    Xie, Yamie
    Zhu, Ying
    Chai, Weimin
    Zong, Shaoyun
    Xu, Shangyan
    Zhan, Weiwei
    Zhang, Xiaoxiao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [26] Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Lo, Chung-Ming
    Chang, Jung Min
    Huang, Chiun-Sheng
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Chang, Ruey-Feng
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (06) : 1091 - 1098
  • [27] Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
    Tozaki, Mitsuhiro
    Fukuma, Eisuke
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2011, 52 (07) : 706 - 710
  • [28] Radiomic Applications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis of BI-RADS Category 4 Calcifications Sent for Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy
    Favati, Benedetta
    Borgheresi, Rita
    Giannelli, Marco
    Marini, Carolina
    Vani, Vanina
    Marfisi, Daniela
    Linsalata, Stefania
    Moretti, Monica
    Mazzotta, Dionisia
    Neri, Emanuele
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [29] Subcategorization of Suspicious Breast Lesions (BI-RADS Category 4) According to MRI Criteria: Role of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Maltez de Almeida, Joao Ricardo
    Gomes, Andre Boechat
    Barros, Thomas Pitangueira
    Fahel, Paulo Eduardo
    Rocha, Mario de Seixas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (01) : 222 - 231
  • [30] Utility of BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions for Screening Breast MRI
    Strigel, Roberta M.
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    Elezaby, Mai
    Fowler, Amy M.
    Kelcz, Frederick
    Salkowski, Lonie R.
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (06) : 1392 - 1399