Development and validation of a patient self-assessed questionnaire on satisfaction with communication of the multiple sclerosis diagnosis

被引:23
作者
Solari, A. [1 ]
Mattarozzi, K. [2 ]
Vignatelli, L. [3 ]
Giordano, A. [1 ]
Russo, P. M. [2 ]
Uccelli, M. Messmer [4 ]
D'Alessandro, R. [5 ]
机构
[1] Neurol Inst C Besta, Fdn IRCCS, Neuroepidemiol Unit, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Psychol, Bologna, Italy
[3] Neurol Outpatient Clin, Local Hlth Unit, Bologna, Italy
[4] Italian Multiple Sclerosis Soc, Dept Hlth Sci & Res, Genoa, Italy
[5] Univ Bologna, Dept Neurol Sci, Bologna, Italy
关键词
diagnosis communication; multiple sclerosis; patient-reported outcomes; patient satisfaction; psychometrics; validation studies; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GENERAL-PRACTICE; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; DECISION-MAKING; ITALIAN VERSION; HEALTH-CARE; DEPRESSION; PEOPLE; PARTICIPATION; CONSULTATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/1352458510376178
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Method: A multiple sclerosis expert panel generated questionnaire items from the Doctor's Interpersonal Skills Questionnaire, literature review, and interviews with neurology inpatients. The resulting 19-item Comunicazione medico-paziente nella Sclerosi Multipla (COSM) was pilot tested/debriefed on seven patients with multiple sclerosis and administered to 80 patients newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. The resulting revised 20-item version (COSM-R) was debriefed on five patients with multiple sclerosis, field tested/debriefed on multiple sclerosis patients, and field tested on 105 patients newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis participating in a clinical trial on an information aid. The hypothesized monofactorial structure of COSM-R section 2 was tested on the latter two groups. Results: The questionnaire was well accepted. Scaling assumptions were satisfactory in terms of score distributions, item-total correlations and internal consistency. Factor analysis confirmed section 2's monofactorial structure, which was also test-retest reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.73; 95% CI 0.54-0.85). Section 1 had only fair test-retest reliability (ICC 0.45; 95% CI 0.12-0.69), and three items had 8-21% missed responses. Conclusions: COSM-R is a brief, easy-to-interpret MS-specific questionnaire for use as a health care indicator.
引用
收藏
页码:1237 / 1247
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
BAKER R, 1990, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V40, P487
[2]  
Bentler P. M., 1995, EQS: Structural equations program manual
[3]   Posttraumatic stress disorder following diagnosis of multiple sclerosis [J].
Chalfant, AM ;
Bryant, RA ;
Fulcher, G .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2004, 17 (05) :423-428
[4]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[5]   Detecting psychological distress in cancer patients: validity of the Italian version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [J].
Costantini, M ;
Musso, M ;
Viterbori, P ;
Bonci, F ;
Del Mastro, L ;
Garrone, O ;
Venturini, M ;
Morasso, G .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1999, 7 (03) :121-127
[6]   Can patients assess the quality of health care? Patients' surveys should ask about real experiences of medical care [J].
Coulter, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7557) :1-2
[7]   Patients' views of the good doctor - Doctors have to earn patients' trust [J].
Coulter, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7366) :668-669
[8]   What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? [J].
Deber, RB ;
Kraetschmer, N ;
Irvine, J .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (13) :1414-1420
[9]  
Degner L F, 1997, Can J Nurs Res, V29, P21
[10]   THE QUALITY OF CARE - HOW CAN IT BE ASSESSED [J].
DONABEDIAN, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (12) :1743-1748