Healthcare service quality evaluation: An integrated decision-making methodology and a case study

被引:15
作者
Karasan, Ali [1 ]
Erdogan, Melike [2 ]
Cinar, Melih [3 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Duzce Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Konuralp, Duzce, Turkey
[3] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Math Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Applied sciences; Fuzzy inference system; Healthcare management; Interval valued fuzzy sets; Pythagorean fuzzy sets; Service quality; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; CONSENSUS MODEL; FUZZY AHP; BENCHMARKING; HOSPITALS; FRAMEWORK; INDUSTRY; NUMBERS; SYSTEMS; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.seps.2022.101234
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Developments and changes in health services give importance to the concept of competition and encourage to increase quality among the healthcare centers. During these processes, the most required expectations from the system are achieving the desired quality and maintenance of the system environments. In this sense, measurement and continuous improvement of service quality are crucial for health centers to provide better service to patients. For this aim, this paper presents an integrated assessment methodology based on the distance-based Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, TOPSIS, and Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) for the measurement of health care service quality. To show the efficiency of the proposed method, a case study is carried out by comparing the ten clinics of a private hospital. Five dimensions of service quality (SERVQUAL) have been used as the main criteria for evaluating the service quality levels of the clinics, and multiple sub-criteria are determined for each dimension for a detailed analysis. Pythagorean Fuzzy TOPSIS is executed to the determined decision matrices to obtain inputs of the fuzzy rule-based system. Then, the clinic's service quality levels are calculated by implementing the fuzzy inference system. Moreover, sensitivity analyses based on the changes in the decision makers' weights are also applied to check the flexibility of the results. Finally, implementations with respect to theoretical, managerial, and policy aspects are discussed based on the obtained results.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Healthcare Sustainability Evaluation Using a Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model [J].
Erjaee, Asma ;
Hendiani, Sepehr ;
Moradi, Shohreh ;
Bagherpour, Morteza .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 24 (02) :1182-1202
[32]   Equilibrium Design Based on Design Thinking Solving: An Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Methodology [J].
Feng, Yi-Xiong ;
Gao, Yi-Cong ;
Song, Xuan ;
Tan, Jian-Rong .
ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2013,
[33]   AHP-TOPSIS hybrid decision-making analysis: Simav integrated system case study [J].
Arslan, Asli Ergenekon ;
Arslan, Oguz ;
Kandemir, Suheyla Yerel .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2021, 145 (03) :1191-1202
[34]   Evaluation of equipment maintenance quality: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach [J].
Zhang, Libin ;
Zhang, Lele ;
Shan, Hongying .
ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 11 (03)
[35]   Preliminary Evaluation of Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methodology for Emergency Management [J].
Caylor, Justine P. ;
Hammell, Robert J., II ;
Raglin, Adrienne J. .
ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS AND SYSTEM INTERACTIONS, 2021, 265 :11-18
[36]   Information security investments: An exploratory multiple case study on decision-making, evaluation and learning [J].
Weishaeupl, Eva ;
Yasasin, Emrah ;
Schryen, Guido .
COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2018, 77 :807-823
[37]   A New Hybrid Dynamic FMECA with Decision-Making Methodology: A Case Study in an Agri-Food Company [J].
Di Nardo, Mario ;
Murino, Teresa ;
Osteria, Gianluca ;
Santillo, Liberatina Carmela .
APPLIED SYSTEM INNOVATION, 2022, 5 (03)
[38]   Evaluation of logistics providers for sustainable service quality: Analytics based decision making framework [J].
Gupta, Anchal ;
Singh, Rajesh Kumar ;
Mangla, Sachin Kr .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 315 (02) :1617-1664
[39]   Evaluation of benchmarking attribute for service quality using multi attitude decision making approach [J].
Singh B. ;
Grover S. ;
Singh V. .
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2017, 8 (Suppl 2) :617-630
[40]   Selection of the Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Development: A Case Study of Poland [J].
Trojanowska, Malgorzata ;
Necka, Krzysztof .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (23)