A bibliometric analysis of ecosystem services evaluation from 1997 to 2016

被引:44
作者
Chen, Wei [1 ]
Geng, Yong [2 ,3 ]
Zhong, Shaozhuo [4 ]
Zhuang, Mufan [5 ]
Pan, Hengyu [5 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm, Jinan 250358, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Int & Publ Affairs, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China Inst Urban Governance, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[4] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Western China Econ Res Ctr, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Bibliometric; Social network analysis; Hotspots; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; CONTINGENT VALUATION; TRADE-OFFS; BENEFITS; FLOWS; AREAS; CHINA; COST; CLASSIFICATION; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-08760-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecosystems play critically important roles in supporting human society, while human activities seriously disturb their initial balance. Lots of researches on ecosystem services are conducted due to the increasing concern on ecological security worldwide. In order to provide valuable insights for understanding the primary performance of ecosystem services-related studies, a qualitative and quantitative analysis by using a bibliometric tool is performed in this study. Journal impact factor, CiteScore, andh-index are used for identifying influential journals, whileh-index is used for recognizing productive countries/territories and institutions. Social network analysis of countries/territories and institutions is visualized, respectively, so that relationships among them can be uncovered. Citation analysis of publications and co-occurrence analysis of high-frequency keywords are also performed to explore hotspots and popular methods in this field. This study uncovers a holistic picture on the primary performance of ecosystem services-related literatures published from 1997 to 2016, including journals, countries/territories, and institutions. Results find that forest, agriculture, and wetland ecosystems attract lots of attention. Finally, major methods used for ecosystem services evaluation are identified and discussed. Research outcomes will provide valuable insights to stakeholders interested in ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页码:23503 / 23513
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Moving beyond the exchange value in the nonmarket valuation of ecosystem services [J].
Allen, Karen E. ;
Moore, Rebecca .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 18 :78-86
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING GE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Ecology and Society, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-01569-110114
[5]   The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services [J].
Barbier, Edward B. ;
Hacker, Sally D. ;
Kennedy, Chris ;
Koch, Evamaria W. ;
Stier, Adrian C. ;
Silliman, Brian R. .
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2011, 81 (02) :169-193
[6]   Examining the ecosystem service of nutrient removal in a coastal watershed [J].
Berg, Chelsea E. ;
Mineau, Madeleine M. ;
Rogers, Shannon H. .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 20 :104-112
[7]   The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy [J].
Braat, Leon C. ;
de Groot, Rudolf .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 1 (01) :4-15
[8]   Valuing preservation and restoration alternatives for ecosystem services in the southwestern USA [J].
Broadbent, Craig D. ;
Brookshire, David S. ;
Goodrich, David ;
Dixon, Mark D. ;
Brand, L. Arriana ;
Thacher, Jennifer ;
Stewart, Steve .
ECOHYDROLOGY, 2015, 8 (05) :851-862
[9]  
Buchanan James M., 2008, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
[10]   Contingent valuation: A user's guide [J].
Carson, RT .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (08) :1413-1418