Recurrence of Colorectal Neoplastic Polyps After Incomplete Resection

被引:32
|
作者
Pohl, Heiko [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Anderson, Joseph C. [1 ,3 ]
Aguilera-Fish, Andres [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Calderwood, Audrey H. [2 ,3 ]
Mackenzie, Todd A. [4 ]
Robertson, Douglas J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, White River Jct, VT 05009 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Hanover, NH 03766 USA
[3] Dartmouth Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] Dartmouth Inst, Lebanon, NH USA
关键词
SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; COLONOSCOPY SURVEILLANCE; CONSENSUS UPDATE; POLYPECTOMY; CANCER; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINE; RATES;
D O I
10.7326/M20-6689
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Incomplete resection of neoplastic polyps is considered an important reason for the development of colorectal cancer. However, there are no data on the natural history of polyps that were incompletely removed. Objective: To examine the risk for metachronous neoplasia during surveillance colonoscopy after documented incomplete polyp resection. Design: Observational cohort study of patients who participated in the CARE (Complete Adenoma REsection) study (2009 to 2012). Setting: 2 academic medical centers. Patients: Patients who had resection of a 5- to 20-mm neoplastic polyp, had a documented complete or incomplete resection, and had a surveillance examination. Measurements: Segment metachronous neoplasia, defined as the proportion of colon segments with at least 1 neoplastic polyp at first surveillance examination, was measured. Segment metachronous neoplasia was compared between segments with a prior incomplete polyp resection (incomplete segments) and those with a prior complete resection (complete segments), accounting for clustering of segments within patients. Results: Of 233 participants in the original study, 166 (71%) had at least 1 surveillance examination. Median time to surveillance was shorter after incomplete versus complete resection (median, 17 vs. 45 months). The risk for any metachronous neoplasia was greater in segments with incomplete versus complete resection (52% vs. 23%; risk difference [RD], 28% [95% CI, 9% to 47%]; P = 0.004). Incomplete segments also had a greater number of neoplastic polyps (mean, 0.8 vs. 0.3; RD, 0.50 [CI, 0.1 to 0.9]; P = 0.008) and greater risk for advanced neoplasia (18% vs. 3%; RD, 15% [CI, 1% to 29%]; P = 0.034). Incomplete resection was the strongest independent factor associated with metachronous neoplasia (odds ratio, 3.0 [CI, 1.12 to 8.17]). Limitation: Potential patient selection bias due to incomplete follow-up. Conclusion: This natural history study found a statistically significantly greater risk for future neoplasia and advanced neoplasia in colon segments after incomplete resection compared with segments with complete resection.
引用
收藏
页码:1377 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of surveillance with CT colonography after resection of colorectal cancer
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    Popp, Jonah
    Beck, J. Robert
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Weinberg, David S.
    BMJ OPEN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [42] Recurrence patterns predict survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases
    Wong, Geoffrey Yuet Mun
    Mol, Barend
    Bhimani, Nazim
    de Reuver, Philip
    Diakos, Connie
    Molloy, Mark P.
    Hugh, Thomas J.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (09) : 2149 - 2156
  • [43] LOCAL RECURRENCE AND SURVEILLANCE AFTER ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION OF LARGE COLORECTAL TUMORS
    Hotta, Kinichi
    Saito, Yutaka
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    Shinohara, Tomoaki
    Oyama, Tsuneo
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 22 : S63 - S68
  • [44] Recurrence Location After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases Influences Prognosis
    Govaert, K. M.
    van Kessel, C. S.
    Steller, E. J. A.
    Emmink, B. L.
    Molenaar, I. Q.
    Kranenburg, O.
    van Hillegersberg, R.
    Rinkes, I. H. M. Borel
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (05) : 952 - 960
  • [45] Optimal surveillance interval after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Nakajima, Takeshi
    Sakamoto, Taku
    Hori, Shinichiro
    Yamada, Shinya
    Ikematsu, Hiroaki
    Harada, Keita
    Chiu, Han-Mo
    Kiriyama, Shinsuke
    Michida, Tomoki
    Hotta, Kinichi
    Sakamoto, Naoto
    Abe, Takashi
    Chino, Akiko
    Fukuzawa, Masakatsu
    Kobayashi, Nozomu
    Fukase, Kazutoshi
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    Murakami, Yoshitaka
    Ishikawa, Hideki
    Saito, Yutaka
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (01): : 515 - 525
  • [46] Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Recurrence Rate for Colorectal Lesions
    Ortiz, Arleen M.
    Bhargavi, Patham
    Zuckerman, Marc J.
    Othman, Mohamed O.
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 107 (10) : 615 - 621
  • [47] Mucins in neoplastic spectrum of colorectal polyps: can they provide predictions?
    Molaei, Mahsa
    Mansoori, Babak Khoshkrood
    Mashayekhi, Reza
    Vahedi, Mohsen
    Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Amin
    Fatemi, Seyed Reza
    Zali, Mohammad Reza
    BMC CANCER, 2010, 10
  • [48] Factors Associated With Recurrence of Advanced Colorectal Adenoma After Endoscopic Resection
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Di Maso, Marianna
    Serviddio, Gaetano
    Vendemiale, Gianluigi
    Spada, Cristiano
    Costamagna, Guido
    Muscatiello, Nicola
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 14 (08) : 1148 - +
  • [49] Risk factors of unintentional piecemeal resection in endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps ≥ 10 mm
    Ishikawa, Tsubasa
    Okimoto, Kenichiro
    Matsumura, Tomoaki
    Ogasawara, Sadahisa
    Fukuda, Yoshihiro
    Kitsukawa, Yoshio
    Yokoyama, Yuya
    Kanayama, Kengo
    Akizue, Naoki
    Iino, Yotaro
    Ohta, Yuki
    Ishigami, Hideaki
    Taida, Takashi
    Tsuchiya, Shin
    Saito, Keiko
    Kamezaki, Hidehiro
    Kobayashi, Akitoshi
    Kikuchi, Yasuharu
    Tada, Minoru
    Shiko, Yuki
    Ozawa, Yoshihito
    Kato, Jun
    Yamaguchi, Taketo
    Kato, Naoya
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [50] Investigation of the Local Recurrence Rate after Colorectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Is Incomplete Polyp Resection Really a Clinically Important Problem? Analysis of the Rationale for the "Resect and Discard" Strategy
    Arimoto, Jun
    Higurashi, Takuma
    Chiba, Hideyuki
    Misawa, Noboru
    Yoshihara, Tsutomu
    Kato, Takayuki
    Kanoshima, Kenji
    Fuyuki, Akiko
    Ohkubo, Hidenori
    Nonaka, Takashi
    Sato, Takamitsu
    Sakai, Eiji
    Iida, Hiroshi
    Goto, Tohru
    Nakajima, Atsushi
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 2019