Recurrence of Colorectal Neoplastic Polyps After Incomplete Resection

被引:32
|
作者
Pohl, Heiko [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Anderson, Joseph C. [1 ,3 ]
Aguilera-Fish, Andres [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Calderwood, Audrey H. [2 ,3 ]
Mackenzie, Todd A. [4 ]
Robertson, Douglas J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, White River Jct, VT 05009 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Hanover, NH 03766 USA
[3] Dartmouth Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] Dartmouth Inst, Lebanon, NH USA
关键词
SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; COLONOSCOPY SURVEILLANCE; CONSENSUS UPDATE; POLYPECTOMY; CANCER; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINE; RATES;
D O I
10.7326/M20-6689
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Incomplete resection of neoplastic polyps is considered an important reason for the development of colorectal cancer. However, there are no data on the natural history of polyps that were incompletely removed. Objective: To examine the risk for metachronous neoplasia during surveillance colonoscopy after documented incomplete polyp resection. Design: Observational cohort study of patients who participated in the CARE (Complete Adenoma REsection) study (2009 to 2012). Setting: 2 academic medical centers. Patients: Patients who had resection of a 5- to 20-mm neoplastic polyp, had a documented complete or incomplete resection, and had a surveillance examination. Measurements: Segment metachronous neoplasia, defined as the proportion of colon segments with at least 1 neoplastic polyp at first surveillance examination, was measured. Segment metachronous neoplasia was compared between segments with a prior incomplete polyp resection (incomplete segments) and those with a prior complete resection (complete segments), accounting for clustering of segments within patients. Results: Of 233 participants in the original study, 166 (71%) had at least 1 surveillance examination. Median time to surveillance was shorter after incomplete versus complete resection (median, 17 vs. 45 months). The risk for any metachronous neoplasia was greater in segments with incomplete versus complete resection (52% vs. 23%; risk difference [RD], 28% [95% CI, 9% to 47%]; P = 0.004). Incomplete segments also had a greater number of neoplastic polyps (mean, 0.8 vs. 0.3; RD, 0.50 [CI, 0.1 to 0.9]; P = 0.008) and greater risk for advanced neoplasia (18% vs. 3%; RD, 15% [CI, 1% to 29%]; P = 0.034). Incomplete resection was the strongest independent factor associated with metachronous neoplasia (odds ratio, 3.0 [CI, 1.12 to 8.17]). Limitation: Potential patient selection bias due to incomplete follow-up. Conclusion: This natural history study found a statistically significantly greater risk for future neoplasia and advanced neoplasia in colon segments after incomplete resection compared with segments with complete resection.
引用
收藏
页码:1377 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Recurrence patterns after laparoscopic resection of colorectal liver metastases
    Tabchouri, Nicolas
    Gayet, Brice
    Okumura, Shinya
    Donatelli, Gianfranco
    Beaussier, Marc
    Bennamoun, Mostefa
    Louvet, Christophe
    Fuks, David
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (12): : 4788 - 4797
  • [32] Overutilization of surgical resection for benign colorectal polyps: analysis from a tertiary care center
    Saade, Rayan
    Tsang, Tyler
    Kmeid, Michel
    Miller, David
    Fu, Zhiyan
    Litynski, James
    Young, Patrick
    Anderson, Joseph C.
    Lee, Hwajeong
    Tadros, Micheal
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (05) : E706 - E712
  • [33] Prioritizing an oncologic approach to endoscopic resection of pedunculated colorectal polyps
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Risio, Mauro
    Hassan, Cesare
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 94 (01) : 155 - 159
  • [34] Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps in typical UK hospitals
    Lim, Teegan R.
    Mahesh, Venkat
    Singh, Salil
    Tan, Benjamin H. L.
    Elsadig, Mohamed
    Radhakrishnan, Nerukav
    Conlong, Phil
    Babbs, Chris
    George, Regi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (42) : 5324 - 5328
  • [35] Laparoscopic colorectal resection for benign polyps not suitable for endoscopic polypectomy
    Hauenschild, Lena
    Bader, Franz Georg
    Laubert, Tilman
    Czymek, Ralf
    Hildebrand, Philipp
    Roblick, Uwe Johannes
    Bruch, Hans-Peter
    Mirow, Lutz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 24 (07) : 755 - 759
  • [36] Development and validation of a risk score for advanced colorectal adenoma recurrence after endoscopic resection
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Di Maso, Marianna
    Serviddio, Gaetano
    Vendemiale, Gianluigi
    Muscatiello, Nicola
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (26) : 6049 - 6056
  • [37] Resection Margin and Recurrence-Free Survival After Liver Resection of Colorectal Metastases
    Muratore, Andrea
    Ribero, Dario
    Zimmitti, Giuseppe
    Mellano, Alfredo
    Langella, Serena
    Capussotti, Lorenzo
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (05) : 1324 - 1329
  • [38] Establishment and Verification of Scoring System for Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence
    Xi, Xujie
    Fu, Zhaoli
    Liu, Tianwen
    Lin, Yanfeng
    Wu, Wenbin
    Li, Jianmin
    Luo, Ming
    Zhang, Beiping
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2021, 14 : 4545 - 4552
  • [39] Frequency of endoscopic photodocumentation of large colorectal polyps
    Khan, Afshin A.
    Sarmini, Muhammad Talal
    Bell, Ruth
    El Halabi, Jessica
    Lyu, Ruishen
    Macaron, Carole
    Bhatt, Amit
    Burke, Carol A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 98 (05) : 797 - 802
  • [40] Endoscopic Recognition and Resection of Malignant Colorectal Polyps
    Wilson, Natalie
    Gabr, Moamen
    Bilal, Mohammad
    TECHNIQUES AND INNOVATIONS IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 25 (04): : 385 - 398