Recurrence of Colorectal Neoplastic Polyps After Incomplete Resection

被引:32
|
作者
Pohl, Heiko [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Anderson, Joseph C. [1 ,3 ]
Aguilera-Fish, Andres [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Calderwood, Audrey H. [2 ,3 ]
Mackenzie, Todd A. [4 ]
Robertson, Douglas J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, White River Jct, VT 05009 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Hanover, NH 03766 USA
[3] Dartmouth Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] Dartmouth Inst, Lebanon, NH USA
关键词
SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; COLONOSCOPY SURVEILLANCE; CONSENSUS UPDATE; POLYPECTOMY; CANCER; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINE; RATES;
D O I
10.7326/M20-6689
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Incomplete resection of neoplastic polyps is considered an important reason for the development of colorectal cancer. However, there are no data on the natural history of polyps that were incompletely removed. Objective: To examine the risk for metachronous neoplasia during surveillance colonoscopy after documented incomplete polyp resection. Design: Observational cohort study of patients who participated in the CARE (Complete Adenoma REsection) study (2009 to 2012). Setting: 2 academic medical centers. Patients: Patients who had resection of a 5- to 20-mm neoplastic polyp, had a documented complete or incomplete resection, and had a surveillance examination. Measurements: Segment metachronous neoplasia, defined as the proportion of colon segments with at least 1 neoplastic polyp at first surveillance examination, was measured. Segment metachronous neoplasia was compared between segments with a prior incomplete polyp resection (incomplete segments) and those with a prior complete resection (complete segments), accounting for clustering of segments within patients. Results: Of 233 participants in the original study, 166 (71%) had at least 1 surveillance examination. Median time to surveillance was shorter after incomplete versus complete resection (median, 17 vs. 45 months). The risk for any metachronous neoplasia was greater in segments with incomplete versus complete resection (52% vs. 23%; risk difference [RD], 28% [95% CI, 9% to 47%]; P = 0.004). Incomplete segments also had a greater number of neoplastic polyps (mean, 0.8 vs. 0.3; RD, 0.50 [CI, 0.1 to 0.9]; P = 0.008) and greater risk for advanced neoplasia (18% vs. 3%; RD, 15% [CI, 1% to 29%]; P = 0.034). Incomplete resection was the strongest independent factor associated with metachronous neoplasia (odds ratio, 3.0 [CI, 1.12 to 8.17]). Limitation: Potential patient selection bias due to incomplete follow-up. Conclusion: This natural history study found a statistically significantly greater risk for future neoplasia and advanced neoplasia in colon segments after incomplete resection compared with segments with complete resection.
引用
收藏
页码:1377 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Margin marking before colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection and its impact on neoplasia recurrence
    Yang, Dennis
    Draganov, Peter, V
    King, William
    Liu, Nanlong
    Sarheed, Ahmed
    Bhat, Adnan
    Jiang, Peter
    Ladna, Michael
    Ruiz, Nicole C.
    Wilson, Jake
    Gorrepati, Venkata S.
    Pohl, Heiko
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (05) : 956 - 965
  • [22] Local recurrence rates after resection of large colorectal serrated lesions with or without margin thermal ablation
    Djinbachian, Roupen
    Amar, Laetitia
    Pohl, Heiko
    Safih, Widad
    Bouchard, Simon
    Deslandres, Erik
    Dorais, Judy
    von Renteln, Daniel
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 59 (01) : 112 - 117
  • [23] Patient adherence to surveillance colonoscopy after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps and factors associated with loss to follow-up
    Farooq, Aimen
    Fawwaz, BahaAldeen Bani
    Mian, Arooj
    Singh, Gurdeep
    Zhang, Yiyang
    Gerges, Peter
    Kadkhodayan, Kambiz
    Jain, Deepanshu
    Cosgrove, Natalie
    Arain, Mustafa A.
    Hasan, Muhammad Khalid
    Yang, Dennis
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2025, 13
  • [24] Margin thermal ablation eliminates size as a risk factor for recurrence after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps
    Gauci, Julia L.
    Mandarino, Francesco Vito
    Kerrison, Clarence
    Whitfield, Anthony M.
    O'Sullivan, Timothy
    Gupta, Sunil
    Lam, Brian
    Perananthan, Varan
    Cronin, Oliver
    Lee, Eric Y.
    Williams, Steven J.
    Burgess, Nicholas
    Bourke, Michael J.
    GUT, 2025, : 752 - 760
  • [25] The association between colorectal sessile serrated adenomas/polyps and subsequent advanced colorectal neoplasia
    Burnett-Hartman, Andrea N.
    Chubak, Jessica
    Hua, Xinwei
    Ziebell, Rebecca
    Kamineni, Aruna
    Zhu, Lee-Ching
    Upton, Melissa P.
    Malen, Rachel C.
    Hardikar, Sheetal
    Newcomb, Polly A.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2019, 30 (09) : 979 - 987
  • [26] Commentary on "Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Recurrence Rate for Colorectal Lesion"
    Brady, Patrick G.
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 107 (10) : 622 - 623
  • [27] Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Individuals With a History of Serrated Polyps
    Li, Dan
    Liu, Liyan
    Fevrier, Helene B.
    Alexeeff, Stacey E.
    Doherty, Amanda R.
    Raju, Menaka
    Amsden, Laura B.
    Lee, Jeffrey K.
    Levin, Theodore R.
    Corley, Douglas A.
    Herrinton, Lisa J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 159 (02) : 502 - +
  • [28] Incomplete resection of colorectal polyps of 4-20 mm in size when using a cold snare, and its associated factors
    von Renteln, Daniel
    Djinbachian, Roupen
    Benard, Florence
    Barkun, Alan N.
    Bouin, Mickael
    Bouchard, Simon
    Deslandres, Erik
    Panzini, Benoit
    Sidani, Sacha
    Leduc, Raymond
    Jobse, Bruce C.
    Pohl, Heiko
    ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 (10) : 929 - 937
  • [29] Optimizing Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps
    Steven J. Heitman
    David J. Tate
    Michael J. Bourke
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2017, 15 (1) : 213 - 229
  • [30] Cold Snare Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Updates and Recent DevelopmentsCold Snare Resection Colorectal Polyps: Updates and Developments
    Roupen Djinbachian
    Daniel von Renteln
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2022, 20 (3) : 221 - 237