Recurrence of Colorectal Neoplastic Polyps After Incomplete Resection

被引:32
|
作者
Pohl, Heiko [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Anderson, Joseph C. [1 ,3 ]
Aguilera-Fish, Andres [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Calderwood, Audrey H. [2 ,3 ]
Mackenzie, Todd A. [4 ]
Robertson, Douglas J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, White River Jct, VT 05009 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Hanover, NH 03766 USA
[3] Dartmouth Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] Dartmouth Inst, Lebanon, NH USA
关键词
SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; COLONOSCOPY SURVEILLANCE; CONSENSUS UPDATE; POLYPECTOMY; CANCER; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINE; RATES;
D O I
10.7326/M20-6689
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Incomplete resection of neoplastic polyps is considered an important reason for the development of colorectal cancer. However, there are no data on the natural history of polyps that were incompletely removed. Objective: To examine the risk for metachronous neoplasia during surveillance colonoscopy after documented incomplete polyp resection. Design: Observational cohort study of patients who participated in the CARE (Complete Adenoma REsection) study (2009 to 2012). Setting: 2 academic medical centers. Patients: Patients who had resection of a 5- to 20-mm neoplastic polyp, had a documented complete or incomplete resection, and had a surveillance examination. Measurements: Segment metachronous neoplasia, defined as the proportion of colon segments with at least 1 neoplastic polyp at first surveillance examination, was measured. Segment metachronous neoplasia was compared between segments with a prior incomplete polyp resection (incomplete segments) and those with a prior complete resection (complete segments), accounting for clustering of segments within patients. Results: Of 233 participants in the original study, 166 (71%) had at least 1 surveillance examination. Median time to surveillance was shorter after incomplete versus complete resection (median, 17 vs. 45 months). The risk for any metachronous neoplasia was greater in segments with incomplete versus complete resection (52% vs. 23%; risk difference [RD], 28% [95% CI, 9% to 47%]; P = 0.004). Incomplete segments also had a greater number of neoplastic polyps (mean, 0.8 vs. 0.3; RD, 0.50 [CI, 0.1 to 0.9]; P = 0.008) and greater risk for advanced neoplasia (18% vs. 3%; RD, 15% [CI, 1% to 29%]; P = 0.034). Incomplete resection was the strongest independent factor associated with metachronous neoplasia (odds ratio, 3.0 [CI, 1.12 to 8.17]). Limitation: Potential patient selection bias due to incomplete follow-up. Conclusion: This natural history study found a statistically significantly greater risk for future neoplasia and advanced neoplasia in colon segments after incomplete resection compared with segments with complete resection.
引用
收藏
页码:1377 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection for large sessile colorectal polyps
    Seo, Guh Jung
    Sohn, Dae Kyung
    Han, Kyung Su
    Hong, Chang Won
    Kim, Byung Chang
    Park, Ji Won
    Choi, Hyo Seong
    Chang, Hee Jin
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (22) : 2806 - 2811
  • [2] Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rotermund, Carola
    Djinbachian, Roupen
    Taghiakbari, Mahsa
    Enderle, Markus D.
    Eickhoff, Axel
    von Renteln, Daniel
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 28 (29) : 4007 - 4018
  • [3] Evaluation of risk factors for the recurrence of colorectal polyps and colorectal cancer
    Ates, Ozturk
    Sivri, Bulent
    Kilickap, Saadettin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 47 (05) : 1370 - 1376
  • [4] Incomplete endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps: a prospective quality assurance study
    Pedersen, Ina B.
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Kalager, Mette
    Loberg, Magnus
    Hoff, Geir
    Matapour, Senaria
    Hugin, Silje
    Frigstad, Svein O.
    Seip, Birgitte
    Kleist, Britta A.
    Lovdal, Leif
    Botteri, Edoardo
    Holme, Oyvind
    ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 53 (04) : 383 - 391
  • [5] Recurrence and Carcinogenetic Rates of Colorectal Polyps
    Stoian, Marilena
    Becheanu, Gabriel
    Balescu, Irina
    Eftimie, Mihai
    Petrea, Sorin
    Diaconu, Camelia
    Gaspar, Bogdan
    Pop, Lucian
    Varlas, Valentin
    Hasegan, Adrian
    Martac, Cristina
    Bolca, Ciprian
    Stroescu, Cezar
    Zgura, Anca
    Bacalbasa, Nicolae
    CHIRURGIA, 2024, 119 (01) : 21 - 35
  • [6] Quantitative analysis of in vivo high-resolution microendoscopic images for the detection of neoplastic colorectal polyps
    Tang, Yubo
    Polydorides, Alexandros D.
    Anandasabapathy, Sharmila
    Richards-Kortum, Rebecca R.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2018, 23 (11)
  • [7] Surveillance recommendations after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps
    Merino, Luisa Adan
    Soler, Ana Maria Mora
    Diaz, angel Ponferrada
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2024, 163 (03): : 143 - 148
  • [8] Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population
    Huang, Yinglong
    Gong, Wei
    Su, Bingzhong
    Zhi, Fachao
    Liu, Side
    Bai, Yang
    Jiang, Bo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 45 (08) : 838 - 845
  • [9] Endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps : prospective evaluation of recurrence and complications
    Carvalho, Rita
    Areia, Miguel
    Brito, Daniel
    Saraiva, Sandra
    Alves, Susana
    Cadime, Ana Teresa
    ACTA GASTRO-ENTEROLOGICA BELGICA, 2013, 76 (02) : 225 - 230
  • [10] Risk Factors for Local Recurrence of Large, Flat Colorectal Polyps after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
    Zhan, Tianzuo
    Hielscher, Thomas
    Hahn, Felix
    Hauf, Corinna
    Betge, Johannes
    Ebert, Matthias P.
    Belle, Sebastian
    DIGESTION, 2016, 93 (04) : 311 - 317