Onramp to Scholarship: Putting Clinical Faculty Members on the Path to Academic Productivity

被引:6
作者
Cahn, Peter S. [1 ]
机构
[1] MGH Inst Hlth Profess, Ctr Interprofess Studies & Innovat, Interprofess Studies, Boston, MA 02129 USA
关键词
faculty development; mentoring; scholarly productivity; academic advancement; clinical faculty; team science; writing; WRITING GROUP; EDUCATION; PROMOTE; TEAMS;
D O I
10.1097/CEH.0000000000000260
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Many faculty members in the health professions who come from a clinical background lack the research experience to produce original scholarship. Most faculty development programs focus on supporting individual projects, which helps faculty members who are already pursuing an intellectual question to locate useful resources. Those programs provide limited benefit, however, to faculty members without an identified academic project. An independent, health sciences graduate school designed and implemented a solution to create scholarship groups in which early career faculty members joined ongoing projects led by an experienced investigator. Groups presented internally at a midyear check-in and an end of the academic year poster session. Of the four groups launched in September 2017, three pursued systematic reviews or analyses of existing data. At the end of 9 months, all 4 groups had drafted a manuscript for peer review. Collectively, members of the group had made five poster presentations at national or international conferences and hosted one continuing education workshop. The experience suggests that collaborative projects are a viable form of faculty development to enhance scholarly productivity. Borrowing from the postdoctoral model of scientific mentoring, early career faculty members sacrifice some autonomy of intellectual pursuits in exchange for expert guidance. Senior investigators invest time in coaching novice researchers in exchange for additional intellectual labor and perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 222
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] One school's strategy to assess and improve the vitality of its faculty
    Bland, CJ
    Seaquist, E
    Pacala, JT
    Center, B
    Finstad, D
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2002, 77 (05) : 368 - 376
  • [2] Boyce EG, 2009, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V29, P124, DOI 10.1592/phco.29.1.127
  • [3] Boyer E. L., 1990, Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate
  • [4] Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education
    Bridges, Diane R.
    Davidson, Richard A.
    Odegard, Peggy Soule
    Maki, Ian V.
    Tomkowiak, John
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2011, 16
  • [5] The Journey to Becoming an Adult Learner From Dependent to Self-Directed Learning
    Daily, Joshua A.
    Landis, Benjamin J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (19) : 2066 - 2068
  • [6] Franks AM, 2018, AM J PHARM EDUC, V82, P654, DOI 10.5688/ajpe6556
  • [7] Clearing the confusion about self-directed learning and self-regulated learning
    Gandomkar, Roghayeh
    Sandars, John
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2018, 40 (08) : 862 - 863
  • [8] The Essential Value of Projects in Faculty Development
    Gusic, Maryellen E.
    Milner, Robert J.
    Tisdell, Elizabeth J.
    Taylor, Edward W.
    Quillen, David A.
    Thorndyke, Luanne E.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (09) : 1484 - 1491
  • [9] Effect of an undergraduate medical curriculum on students' self-directed learning
    Harvey, BJ
    Rothman, AI
    Frecker, RC
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2003, 78 (12) : 1259 - 1265
  • [10] A skill to be worked at: using social learning theory to explore the process of learning from role models in clinical settings
    Horsburgh, Jo
    Ippolito, Kate
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 18