Additional costs of nature management caused by deposition

被引:11
作者
Wamelink, GWW [1 ]
de Jong, JJ [1 ]
Van Dobben, HF [1 ]
Van Wijk, MN [1 ]
机构
[1] Alterra, Green World Res, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
management costs; nitrogen; deposition; model; vegetation; Heathland;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.08.004
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Effects of atmospheric deposition on natural areas can be mitigated by management. For example, the effects of excessive nitrogen deposition can partly be overcome by intensifying measures like mowing or sod cutting. The costs of this extra management may, in the future, no longer be required when deposition rates decrease. We developed a method to calculate the costs of the intensified nature management that is required at increased deposition rates. We used a set of models that simulate the biomass development under different management regimes necessary to maintain a certain level of biodiversity. The costs were calculated for several vegetation types based on, among others, the biomass and litter that was removed. Preliminary results show that the models can be applied with some success to assess these costs. Model outcomes show a clear effect of management intensity on biomass growth in heathland and grassland although no differences were found in forest. The biodiversity in heathlands clearly increased when management was intensified. As an example, the extra costs in heathlands that are made to counteract the effects of atmospheric deposition were calculated for The Netherlands. The costs of maintaining heathlands with sods being removed from heathlands every 20 years (presently the usual rate) exceed those in a situation of sod cutting every 60 years (the expected rate without atmospheric deposition) by 1.4 in Euro per year. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 451
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [11] Calibrating Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, acidity, nutrient availability and salinity in the Netherlands
    Ertsen, ACD
    Alkemade, JRM
    Wassen, MJ
    [J]. PLANT ECOLOGY, 1998, 135 (01) : 113 - 124
  • [12] Ecological structure and functions of biodiversity as elements of its total economic value
    Fromm, O
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2000, 16 (03) : 303 - 328
  • [13] Nitrogen and climate change
    Hungate, BA
    Dukes, JS
    Shaw, MR
    Luo, YQ
    Field, CB
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2003, 302 (5650) : 1512 - 1513
  • [14] *IMAG, 2001, 200105 IMAG
  • [15] Trends in atmospheric concentration and deposition compared to regional and local pollutant emissions at a rural site in southeastern New York, USA
    Kelly, VR
    Lovett, GM
    Weathers, KC
    Likens, GE
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (10) : 1569 - 1575
  • [16] Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes
    Kleijn, D
    Berendse, F
    Smit, R
    Gilissen, N
    [J]. NATURE, 2001, 413 (6857) : 723 - 725
  • [17] Uncertainty assessment in modelling soil acidification at the European scale: A case study
    Kros, J
    Pebesma, EJ
    Reinds, GJ
    Finke, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1999, 28 (02) : 366 - 377
  • [18] KROS J, 2002, EVALUATION BIOGEOCHE
  • [19] KROS J, 1995, 95 DLO WIN STAR CTR
  • [20] LATOUR JB, 1997, 711901019 RIVM