Multi-objective optimization as a new approach to illumination design of interior spaces

被引:41
作者
Cassol, Fabiano [1 ]
Schneider, Paulo Smith [1 ]
Franca, Francis H. R. [1 ]
Silva Neto, Antonio J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Mech Engn, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Polytech Inst, IPRJ, Nova Friburgo, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Illumination design; Multi-objective optimization; Inverse analysis; Radiosity method; INVERSE DESIGN; ALGORITHM; ENVIRONMENT; OFFICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.07.028
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The illumination design is in general oriented towards attaining a prescribed illuminance on a work plane with the most economical lighting configuration. This work presents a new methodology to find the location and the luminous power of the light sources to satisfy a prescribed illuminance on the work plane with the constraint of lowest power consumption. Mathematically, the illumination design is inherently an inverse problem in which the boundary conditions associated to the light sources are unknown. In the proposed methodology, the inverse analysis is formulated as an optimization problem, in which the objective function aims at minimizing the total power of the light sources as well as the deviation between the prescribed and the resulting illuminance. The optimization problem is solved with the generalized extremal optimization (GEO) algorithm. The lighting calculations are based on the radiosity method. The examples discussed in the paper consider the prescription of uniform illuminance at the bottom surface of a rectangular space. The methodology leads to a set of design solutions that are capable of satisfying the problem with different levels of accuracy and energy consumption. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 338
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, IESNA LIGHTING HDB R
[2]   De-Light: a software tool for the evaluation of direct daylighting illuminances both indoors and outdoors - comparison with Superlite 2.0 and Lumen Micro 7.1. [J].
Bellia, L ;
Cesarano, A ;
Minichiello, F ;
Sibilio, S .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 35 (04) :281-295
[3]   Optimization with extremal dynamics [J].
Boettcher, S ;
Percus, AG .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2001, 86 (23) :5211-5214
[4]  
BOURGEOIS D, 2010, STANDARD DAYLIGHT CO
[5]   Solution of an inverse adsorption problem with an epidemic genetic algorithm and the generalized extremal optimization algorithm [J].
Cuco, Ana Paula C. ;
Silva Neto, Antonio J. ;
Velho, Haroldo F. Campos ;
de Sousa, Fabiano L. .
INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2009, 17 (03) :289-302
[6]   Comparison of methods for inverse design of radiant enclosures [J].
Daun, K ;
França, F ;
Larsen, M ;
Leduc, G ;
Howell, JR .
JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2006, 128 (03) :269-282
[7]   INLUX: A calculation code for daylight illuminance predictions inside buildings and its experimental validation [J].
De Rosa, A. ;
Ferraro, V. ;
Igawa, N. ;
Kaliakatsos, D. ;
Marinelli, V. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 44 (08) :1769-1775
[8]   Application of the generalized extremal optimization algorithm to an inverse radiative transfer problem [J].
De Sousa, F. L. ;
Soeiro, F. J. C. P. ;
Neto, A. J. Silva ;
Ramos, F. M. .
INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2007, 15 (07) :699-714
[9]   New Stochastic algorithm for design optimization [J].
de Sousa, FL ;
Ramos, FM ;
Paglione, P ;
Girardi, RM .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2003, 41 (09) :1808-1818
[10]  
DIAL GmbH Germany, 2005, DIALUX 4 0