Max-product algorithms for the generalized multiple-fault diagnosis problem

被引:12
作者
Le, Tung [1 ]
Hadjicostis, Christoforos N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coordinated Sci Lab, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS | 2007年 / 37卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
belief propagation (BP); max-product algorithm (MPA); multiple-fault diagnosis (MFD); unreliable alarms;
D O I
10.1109/TSMCB.2007.906977
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we study the application of the max-product algorithm (MPA) to the generalized multiple-fault diagnosis (GMFD) problem, which consists of components (to be diagnosed) and alarms/connections that can be unreliable. The MPA and the improved sequential MPA (SMPA) that we develop in this paper are local-message-passing algorithms that operate on the bipartite diagnosis graph (BDG) associated with the GMFD problem and converge to the maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) solution if this graph is acyclic (in addition, the MPA requires the MAP solution to be unique). Our simulations suggest that both the MPA and the SMPA perform well in more general systems that may exhibit cycles in the associated BDGs (the SMPA also appears to outperform the MPA in these more general systems). In this paper, we provide analytical results for acyclic BDGs and also assess the performance of both algorithms under particular patterns of alarm observations in general graphs; this allows us to obtain analytical bounds on the probability of making erroneous diagnosis with respect to the MAP solution. We also evaluate the performance of the MPA and the SMPA algorithms via simulations, and provide comparisons with previously developed heuristics for this type of diagnosis problems. We conclude that the MPA and the SMPA perform well under reasonable computational complexity when the underlying diagnosis graph is sparse.
引用
收藏
页码:1607 / 1621
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, PROBABILISTIC REASON, DOI DOI 10.1016/C2009-0-27609-4
[2]  
[Anonymous], MEDINFO86
[3]   COMPLEXITY OF FAULT-DIAGNOSIS IN COMPARISON MODELS [J].
BLOUGH, DM ;
PELC, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 1992, 41 (03) :318-324
[4]   Using Bayesian network for fault location on distribution feeder [J].
Chien, CF ;
Chen, SL ;
Lin, YS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 2002, 17 (03) :785-793
[5]  
COOPER G, 1987, KSL8727 TANF U MED C
[6]   NETWORK DIAGNOSIS BY REASONING IN UNCERTAIN NESTED EVIDENCE SPACES [J].
DAWES, N ;
ALTOFT, J ;
PAGUREK, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 1995, 43 (2-4) :466-476
[7]   A PROBABILISTIC APPROACH TO FAULT-DIAGNOSIS IN LINEAR LIGHTWAVE NETWORKS [J].
DENG, RH ;
LAZAR, AA ;
WANG, WG .
IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 1993, 11 (09) :1438-1448
[8]   A ROBUST EVENT-ORIENTED METHODOLOGY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF DYNAMIC PROCESS SYSTEMS [J].
FINCH, FE ;
OYELEYE, OO ;
KRAMER, MA .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1990, 14 (12) :1379-1396
[9]  
HECKERMAN D, 1990, P 5 ANN C UNC ART IN, P163
[10]  
Ibaraki T., 1979, Transactions of the Institute of Electronics and Communication Engineers of Japan, Section E (English), VE62, P81