R&D AS A PRISONER'S DILEMMA AND R&D-AVOIDING CARTELS

被引:5
作者
Amir, Rabah [1 ]
Garcia, Filomena [2 ]
Halmenschlager, Christine [3 ]
Pais, Joana [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Tecn Lisboa, ISEG, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Paris 02, ERMES, F-75231 Paris 05, France
[4] Univ Tecn Lisboa, SEG, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
SPILLOVERS; COMPETITION; DUOPOLY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9957.2010.02233.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Duopoly firms engaged in a standard two-stage game of R&D and Cournot competition are caught in a prisoner's dilemma for their R&D decisions whenever spillover effects are low. This effect works to the advantage of consumers and society. This result provides an interesting perspective on the well-known wedge between private and social incentives for R&D. The prisoner's dilemma is the key effect behind this wedge under low spillovers. The latter take over when sufficiently high, as is widely recognized. This mutually exclusive nature of the prisoner's dilemma and significant spillovers also serves to explain the incentives to form R&D cartels.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 99
页数:19
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Cooperation vs. competition in R&D:: the role of stability of equilibrium
    Amir, R
    Wooders, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE, 1998, 67 (01): : 63 - 73
  • [2] Amir R, 2000, J INST THEOR ECON, V156, P583
  • [3] Modelling imperfectly appropriable R&D via spillovers
    Amir, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2000, 18 (07) : 1013 - 1032
  • [4] R&D-induced industry polarization and shake-outs
    Amir, Rabah
    Halmenschlager, Christine
    Jin, Jim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2011, 29 (04) : 386 - 398
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, Capitalism
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1991, Game Theory
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1995, HDB EC INNOVATION TE
  • [8] Bachiegga E., 2008, 651 U BOL
  • [9] BERNSTEIN JI, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P429
  • [10] STRATEGIC COMMITMENT WITH R-AND-D - THE SYMMETRIC CASE
    BRANDER, JA
    SPENCER, BJ
    [J]. BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1983, 14 (01): : 225 - 235