Complications of labor induction among multiparous women in a community-based hospital system

被引:20
作者
Battista, Leah [1 ]
Chung, Judith H.
Lagrew, David C.
Wing, Deborah A.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Saddleback Mem Med Ctr, Laguna Hills, CA USA
关键词
cesarean; labor induction; multipara;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine complications of labor induction compared to spontaneous labor in multiparas. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of multiparous women with live, singleton pregnancies at term, who had no contraindications to labor or labor induction. Cesarean delivery was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Of the study subjects, 7208 experienced spontaneous labor, 2190 underwent labor induction with oxytocin, and 239 underwent labor induction requiring cervical ripening agents. Oxytocin-induced multiparas were 37% more likely to require cesarean compared to those with spontaneous labor (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10- 1.71) and nearly 3 times more likely to undergo cesarean when cervical ripening agents were used (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.84-4.53). Women requiring cervical ripening were also 10 times more likely to spend more than 12 hours in labor than those with spontaneous labor. CONCLUSION: Multiparas undergoing labor induction are at increased risk for obstetric complications compared to spontaneous labor.
引用
收藏
页码:241.e1 / 241.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: A matched cohort study [J].
Cammu, H ;
Martens, G ;
Ruyssinck, G ;
Amy, JJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (02) :240-244
[2]   The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997 [J].
Coonrod, DV ;
Bay, RC ;
Kishi, GY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (06) :1355-1360
[3]  
EIDENBURG L, 2001, MED DECIS MAKING, V21, P170
[4]   Diet and chronic haloperidol effects on rat midbrain dopamine neurons [J].
Hamilton, ME ;
Freeman, AS .
SYNAPSE, 2004, 53 (01) :1-5
[5]   Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix [J].
Johnson, DP ;
Davis, NR ;
Brown, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) :1565-1569
[6]   Elective induction: An analysis of economic and health consequences [J].
Kaufman, KE ;
Bailit, JL ;
Grobman, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (04) :858-863
[7]   ELECTIVE INDUCTION VERSUS SPONTANEOUS LABOR - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF COMPLICATIONS AND OUTCOME [J].
MACER, JA ;
MACER, CL ;
CHAN, LS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (06) :1690-1697
[8]  
Martin Joyce A, 2003, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V52, P1
[9]   Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term [J].
Maslow, AS ;
Sweeny, AL .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (06) :917-922
[10]   Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women [J].
Seyb, ST ;
Berka, RJ ;
Socol, ML ;
Dooley, SL .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (04) :600-607