Comparison of CT and magnetic resonance mDIXON-Quant sequence in the diagnosis of mild hepatic steatosis

被引:33
作者
Zhang, Yong [1 ]
Wang, Chao [2 ]
Duanmu, Yangyang [1 ]
Zhang, Chenxin [1 ]
Zhao, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Ling [1 ]
Cheng, Xiaoguang [1 ]
Veronese, Nicola [3 ]
Guglielmi, Giuseppe [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Beijing Jishuitan Hosp, Radiol Dept, Clin Med Coll 4, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Traumatol & Orthoped, Dept Orthoped, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] CNR, Dept Geriatr, Neurosci Inst, Padua, Italy
[4] Univ Foggia, Dept Radiol, Foggia, Italy
[5] Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hosp, Sci Inst, Dept Radiol, Foggia, Italy
关键词
FATTY LIVER-DISEASE; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT; RISK-FACTORS; QUANTIFICATION; PREVALENCE; POPULATION; ULTRASOUND; BIOPSIES; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20170587
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the diagnostic performance of CT in the assessment of mild hepatic steatosis by comparison with MR mDIXON-Quant as a reference standard, and to explore their clinical applications. Methods: In this prospective study 169 volunteers were included. Each subject underwent CT and MR mDIXON-Quant examinations. Hepatic steatosis evaluations were performed via liver attenuation alone (CT L), liver to spleen attenuation ratio (CT L/S), difference between liver and spleen attenuation (CT L-S), and MR mDIXON-Quant imaging. The effectiveness of CT L, CT L/S, and CT L-S in diagnosing hepatic steatosis severity of >= 5%, >= 10%, and >= 15% was compared, using mDIXON-Quant results as standard. Results: 65 subjects exhibited mild hepatic steatosis. Hepatic steatosis measurement with mDIXON-Quant was strongly correlated with the three CT methods. Using cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing hepatic steatosis >= 5, >= 10, and >= 15% were 64.6, 91.3, 100%, and 90.4, 89.7, 93.0% for CT L; 50.8, 87.0, 100%, and 96.2, 98.6, 97.5% for CT L/S; and 67.7, 87.0, 100%, and 81.7, 98,6, 97.5% for CT L-S, respectively. ROC analysis indicated that 58.9, 56.5, and 52.8 HU for CT L; 1.06, 0.98, and 0.90 HU for CT L/S; and 6.21,-1.04, and -4.93 HU for CT L-S were cutoff values for diagnosing hepatic steatosis >= 5%, >= 10%, and >= 15%, respectively. Conclusions: The three CT methods exhibit better agreements with mDIXON-Quant imaging for diagnosing hepatic steatosis >= 10%. Hence, CT and mDIXON-Quant could serve as suitable tools for the accurate quantification of mild hepatic steatosis. Significant finds of the study: The close agreement between the three different CT methods (based on our cutoff values) and mDIXON-Quant imaging suggests that CT could accurately diagnose hepatic steatosis >= 10%. Thus, CT and mDIXON-Quant imaging can accurately measure mild hepatic steatosis. What this study adds: Only few studies have compared hepatic steatosis quantification between CT and mDIXON-Quant. We are the first to determine the diagnostic performance of unenhanced CT for quantitatively assessing mild hepatic steatosis, in reference to magnetic resonance mDIXON-Quant imaging.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
    Adams, LA
    Angulo, P
    Lindor, KD
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2005, 172 (07) : 899 - 905
  • [2] The histological course of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a longitudinal study of 103 patients with sequential liver biopsies
    Adams, LA
    Sanderson, S
    Lindor, KD
    Angulo, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (01) : 132 - 138
  • [3] Current concepts: Liver biopsy.
    Bravo, AA
    Sheth, SG
    Chopra, S
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (07) : 495 - 500
  • [4] Validity of real time ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: A prospective study
    Dasarathy, Srinivasan
    Dasarathy, Jaividhya
    Khiyami, Amer
    Joseph, Rajesh
    Lopez, Rocio
    McCullough, Arthur J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 51 (06) : 1061 - 1067
  • [5] MRI measurement of liver fat content predicts the metabolic syndrome
    Ducluzeau, P. -H.
    Boursier, J.
    Bertrais, S.
    Dubois, S.
    Gauthier, A.
    Rohmer, V.
    Gagnadoux, F.
    Leftheriotis, G.
    Cales, P.
    Andriantsitohaina, R.
    Roullier, V.
    Aube, C.
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2013, 39 (04) : 314 - 321
  • [6] Epidemiology of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in China
    Fan, Jian-Gao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 : 11 - 17
  • [7] Fatty Liver and Alcoholic Liver Disease Study Group of Chinese Liver Disease Association, 2003, Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi, V11, P71
  • [8] The natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children: a follow-up study for up to 20 years
    Feldstein, A. E.
    Charatcharoenwitthaya, P.
    Treeprasertsuk, S.
    Benson, J. T.
    Enders, F. B.
    Angulo, P.
    [J]. GUT, 2009, 58 (11) : 1538 - 1544
  • [9] Noninvasive biomarkers in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Current status and a glimpse of the future
    Fitzpatrick, Emer
    Dhawan, Anil
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (31) : 10851 - 10863
  • [10] Alanine Aminotransferase, γ-Glutamyltransferase, and Incident Diabetes
    Fraser, Abigail
    Harris, Ross
    Sattar, Naveed
    Ebrahim, Shah
    Smith, George Davey
    Lawlor, Debbie A.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2009, 32 (04) : 741 - 750