Glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity measurements derived from the non-insulin-assisted minimal model and the clamp techniques are concordant

被引:10
|
作者
Henriksen, Jan Erik [1 ]
Alford, Frank [2 ]
Ward, Glenn [2 ]
Thye-Ronn, Peter [1 ]
Levin, Klaus [1 ]
Hother-Nielsen, Ole [1 ]
Rantzau, Christian [3 ]
Boston, Ray [4 ]
Beck-Nielsen, Henning [1 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol M, Diabet Res Ctr, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
[2] St Vincent Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Diabet, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Heidelberg Repatriat Hosp, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Penn, NBC, Sch Vet Med, Dept Clin Studies, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
non-insulin unmodified assisted IVGTT; basal insulinaemic eu-hyperglycaemic clamps; SAAM/CONSAM implementation of minimal model; SG; SI; acute insulin release; TOLERANCE TEST; SECRETION; DISPOSAL; INDEX; CELL; SE; HYPERGLYCEMIA; RELATIVES; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1002/dmrr.1127
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background We investigated the concordance between glucose effectiveness (SG) and insulin sensitivity (SI), derived from the unmodified dynamic non-insulin-assisted intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) implemented by SG(MM) and SIMM; simulation analysis and modelling/conversational interaction (SAAM/CONSAM) versus the eu/hyperglycaemic basal insulinaemic and the euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp (SG(CLAMP) and SICLAMP). Methods Twenty-seven of 30 normoglycaemic subjects completed a (1) euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp, (2) 6-h eu/hyperglycaemic near-normoinsulinaemic pancreatic clamp with hyperglycaemia present over the final 2 h of the clamp (Day 2 study), (3) identical clamp to (2) but with euglycaemia maintained over the entire 6 h (Day 3 study) and (4) IVGTT. SG(CLAMP) was calculated in two ways based on data from study (2) alone (Day 2 SG(CLAMP 210-240')) or from data from study day (2) and (3) (Day 2-3 SG(CLAMP 330-360')). Results SG(MM) was unrelated to the magnitude of endogenous insulin release (AIR). The single-day (Day 2) and two-day (Day 2 and 3) SG(CLAMP) protocols correlated (r = 0.72, p = 0.003), but SG(CLAMP 210-240') was significantly (p = 0.001) higher than SG(CLAMP 330-360'). Employing the Day 2 and 3 SG(CLAMP) protocol, the whole body SG(CLAMP 330-360') was similar to SG(MM) (1.80 +/- 0.82 versus 1.73 +/- 0.58 dL/min) and correlated (r = 0.45, p < 0.02). SG(CLAMP 210-240') did not correlate with SG(MM) (r = 0.24). SIMM and SICLAMP were similar (0.093 +/- 0.060 versus 0.087 +/- 0.029 dL/min per mU/L) and correlated (r = 0.76, p < 0.001). Conclusions The time-dependent increase in glucose disposal observed during a prolonged 6-h clamp significantly influences the estimation of SG(CLAMP), and significant concordance coefficients are observed between SG(MM), and SG(CLAMP 330-360'), and SIMM and SICLAMP. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 578
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EQUIVALENCE OF THE INSULIN SENSITIVITY INDEX IN MAN DERIVED BY THE MINIMAL MODEL METHOD AND THE EUGLYCEMIC GLUCOSE CLAMP
    BERGMAN, RN
    PRAGER, R
    VOLUND, A
    OLEFSKY, JM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1987, 79 (03): : 790 - 800
  • [2] COMPARISON OF THE MINIMAL MODEL AND HYPERGLYCEMIC CLAMP TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING INSULIN SENSITIVITY
    KORYTKOWSKI, M
    BERGA, S
    HORWITZ, M
    DIABETES, 1993, 42 : A169 - A169
  • [3] Prediction of clamp-derived insulin sensitivity from the oral glucose insulin sensitivity index
    Tura, Andrea
    Chemello, Gaetano
    Szendroedi, Julia
    Goebl, Christian
    Faerch, Kristine
    Vrbikova, Jana
    Pacini, Giovanni
    Ferrannini, Ele
    Roden, Michael
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2018, 61 (05) : 1135 - 1141
  • [4] Prediction of clamp-derived insulin sensitivity from the oral glucose insulin sensitivity index
    Andrea Tura
    Gaetano Chemello
    Julia Szendroedi
    Christian Göbl
    Kristine Færch
    Jana Vrbíková
    Giovanni Pacini
    Ele Ferrannini
    Michael Roden
    Diabetologia, 2018, 61 : 1135 - 1141
  • [5] ASSESSMENT OF GLUCOSE EFFECTIVENESS AND INSULIN SENSITIVITY IN CIRRHOSIS BY THE MINIMAL MODEL
    KRUSZYNSKA, Y
    MCINTYRE, N
    HEPATOLOGY, 1991, 14 (04) : A231 - A231
  • [6] COMPARISON OF THE MINIMAL MODEL AND THE HYPERGLYCEMIC CLAMP FOR MEASURING INSULIN SENSITIVITY AND ACUTE INSULIN-RESPONSE TO GLUCOSE
    KORYTKOWSKI, MT
    BERGA, SL
    HORWITZ, MJ
    METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1995, 44 (09): : 1121 - 1125
  • [7] INSULIN SENSITIVITY IN WOMEN WITH GESTATIONAL DIABETES - EUGLYCEMIC CLAMP AND MINIMAL MODEL MEASUREMENTS
    TRIGO, E
    BRUSCHETTA, H
    NADER, I
    DIAZ, J
    SIPOS, G
    BUCHANAN, T
    DIABETES, 1995, 44 : A14 - A14
  • [8] Population approach to estimate insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness by minimal model
    Agbaje, S
    Playle, R
    Luzio, SD
    Albarrak, AIS
    Lunn, DJ
    Owens, DR
    Hovorka, R
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2001, 44 : A55 - A55
  • [9] REPEATABILITY OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY AND GLUCOSE EFFECTIVENESS FROM THE MINIMAL MODEL - IMPLICATIONS FOR STUDY DESIGN
    STEIL, GM
    MURRAY, J
    BERGMAN, RN
    BUCHANAN, TA
    DIABETES, 1994, 43 (11) : 1365 - 1371
  • [10] Insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness: minimal model analysis of regular and insulin-modified FSIGT
    Pacini, G
    Tonolo, G
    Sambataro, M
    Maioli, M
    Ciccarese, M
    Brocco, E
    Avogaro, A
    Nosadini, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 1998, 274 (04): : E592 - E599