Artificial intelligence in orthopedic implant model classification: a systematic review

被引:19
作者
Ren, Mark [1 ,2 ]
Yi, Paul H. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Univ Maryland Intelligent Imaging UMII Ctr, Dept Diag Radiol & Nucl Med, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Malone Ctr Engn Hlthcare, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Machine learning; Neural network; Implant; Hardware; Arthroplasty; Orthopedic surgery; Radiology; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; HIP; PROJECTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00256-021-03884-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Although artificial intelligence models have demonstrated high accuracy in identifying specific orthopedic implant models from imaging, which is an important and time-consuming task, the scope of prior works and performance of prior models have not been evaluated. We performed a systematic review to summarize the scope, methodology, and performance of artificial intelligence algorithms in classifying orthopedic implant models. We performed a literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to March 10, 2021, using search terms related to "artificial intelligence", "orthopedic", "implant", and "arthroplasty". Studies were assessed using a modified version of the methodologic index for non-randomized studies. Reported outcomes included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The search identified 2689 records, of which 11 were included in the final review. The number of implant models evaluated ranged from 2 to 27. Five studies reported overall AUC across all included models which ranged from 0.94 to 1.0. Overall accuracy values ranged from 0.804 to 1.0. One study compared AI model performance with that of three surgeons, reporting similar performance. There was a large degree of variation in methodology and reporting quality. Artificial intelligence algorithms have demonstrated strong performance in classifying orthopedic implant models from radiographs. Further research is needed to compare artificial intelligence alone and as an adjunct with human experts in implant identification. Future studies should aim to adhere to rigorous artificial intelligence development methods and thorough, transparent reporting of methods and results.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 416
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aggarwal, Ravi
    Sounderajah, Viknesh
    Martin, Guy
    Ting, Daniel S. W.
    Karthikesalingam, Alan
    King, Dominic
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Darzi, Ara
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [2] Comparing the performance of a deep convolutional neural network with orthopedic surgeons on the identification of total hip prosthesis design from plain radiographs
    Borjali, Alireza
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Bedair, Hany S.
    Melnic, Christopher M.
    Muratoglu, Orhun K.
    Morid, Mohammad A.
    Varadarajan, Kartik M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (05) : 2327 - 2336
  • [3] Detecting total hip replacement prosthesis design on plain radiographs using deep convolutional neural network
    Borjali, Alireza
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Muratoglu, Orhun K.
    Morid, Mohammad A.
    Varadarajan, Kartik M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2020, 38 (07) : 1465 - 1471
  • [4] Branovacki G., 2008, HIP ARTHROPLASTY US
  • [5] Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models
    Collins, Gary S.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. LANCET, 2019, 393 (10181) : 1577 - 1579
  • [6] Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (03) : 512 - 520
  • [7] A computer vision approach to identifying the manufacturer and model of anterior cervical spinal hardware
    Huang, Kevin T.
    Silva, Michael A.
    See, Alfred P.
    Wu, Kyle C.
    Gallerani, Troy
    Zaidi, Hasan A.
    Lu, Yi
    Chi, John H.
    Groff, Michael W.
    Arnaout, Omar M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (06) : 844 - 850
  • [8] Machine learning ? based identi fi cation of hip arthroplasty designs
    Kang, Yang-Jae
    Yoo, Jun-Il
    Cha, Yong-Han
    Park, Chan H.
    Kim, Jung-Taek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2020, 21 : 13 - 17
  • [9] Artificial Intelligence to Identify Arthroplasty Implants From Radiographs of the Hip
    Karnuta, Jaret M.
    Haeberle, Heather S.
    Luu, Bryan C.
    Roth, Alexander L.
    Molloy, Robert M.
    Nystrom, Lukas M.
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    Schaffer, Jonathan L.
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Iorio, Richard
    Krebs, Viktor E.
    Ramkumar, Prem N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (07) : S290 - +
  • [10] Artificial Intelligence to Identify Arthroplasty Implants From Radiographs of the Knee
    Karnuta, Jaret M.
    Luu, Bryan C.
    Roth, Alexander L.
    Haeberle, Heather S.
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Iorio, Richard
    Schaffer, Jonathan L.
    Mont, Michael A.
    Patterson, Brendan M.
    Krebs, Viktor E.
    Ramkumar, Prem N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (03) : 935 - 940