A Comparison of Traditional and Computer-Assisted Methods for the Development of a German Need for Cognition Short Scale

被引:4
作者
Beissert, Hanna [1 ]
Koehler, Meike [2 ]
Rempel, Marina [3 ]
Kruyen, Peter M. [4 ]
机构
[1] DIPF, Leibniz Inst Bildungsforsch & Bildungsinformat, Rostocker Str 6, D-60323 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Comma Soft AG, Putzchens Chaussee 202-204a, D-53229 Bonn, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Albertus Magnus Pl, D-50923 Cologne, Germany
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, Thomas van Aquinostr 5, NL-6525 GD Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
DIAGNOSTICA | 2020年 / 66卷 / 01期
关键词
Need for Cognition; short scale; item selection; full information approach; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SHORT-FORM; VALIDATION; PERSONALITY; RELIABILITY; MOTIVATION; INVENTORY; SELECTION; CURIOSITY;
D O I
10.1026/0012-1924/a000242
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The current study presents the development and validation of a Need for Cognition (NEC) short scale. In Study 1 (N = 282), traditional item selection procedures based on classic test theory were used as well as an innovative computational approach, our "full information approach." The procedures led to three different short scales with comparable psychometric quality, which were validated in Study 2 (N = 530). Based on different validation criteria, one of the three scales obtained from the full information approach was selected as the final short scale NFC-K. This NFC-K achieved a Cronbach's a of .69, a correlation of .81 with the original scale, and showed no significant correlation with social desirability. Besides presenting a systematic and objective selection and validation of the NFC-K, this article represents a case study of the challenges of developing a short scale comparing both traditional and computational approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 49
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GESIS WORKINGPAPERS
  • [2] [Anonymous], PERSONLICHKEITSPSYCH
  • [3] [Anonymous], GESIS WORKING PAPERS
  • [4] [Anonymous], R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1992, Journal of Adolescent Research, DOI [10.1177/074355489272002, DOI 10.1177/074355489272002, 10.1177/074355-489272002]
  • [6] [Anonymous], 0509 U GREIFSW
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2012, SKALEN ERFASSUNG LER
  • [8] [Anonymous], FFI NEO FUNF FAKTORE
  • [9] Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback
    Anseel, Frederik
    Lievens, Filip
    Schollaert, Eveline
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2009, 110 (01) : 23 - 35
  • [10] Asch S.E., 1952, Social psychology, DOI [DOI 10.1037/10025-000, 10.1037/a0020016]