Thyroid shields for radiation dose reduction during cone beam computed tomography scanning for different oral and maxillofacial regions

被引:29
作者
Qu, Xingmin [1 ]
Li, Gang [1 ]
Zhang, Zuyan [1 ]
Ma, Xuchen [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Cone beam computed tomography; Radiation; Thyroid gland; Radiation protection; Radiation dosage; CBCT DEVICES; CT; DOSIMETRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.048
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aims: To evaluate the radiation dose level during cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning for the different oral and maxillofacial regions with and without thyroid collar shielding. Materials and methods: Average tissue-absorbed dose for a DCT PRO CBCT was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeter chips in a phantom with or without applying thyroid collars. Effective organ dose and total effective dose were derived using International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 2007 recommendations. Results: The total effective doses for large, middle and small field of view (FOV) were 254.3 mu Sv, 249.0 mu Sv and 180.3 mu Sv, respectively, when no thyroid collar was used. Applying one thyroid collar around the front neck can reduce the total effective doses to 208.5 mu Sv (18.0% reduction), 149.1 mu Sv (40.1% reduction) and 110.5 mu Sv (38.7% reduction), respectively. When two thyroid collars were used around the front and back neck, the total effective doses were reduced to 219.1 mu Sv (13.8% reduction), 142.0 mu Sv (43.0% reduction) and 105.5 mu Sv (41.5% reduction), respectively. Conclusions: Thyroid collar can reduce the radiation dose during CBCT scanning for the oral and maxillofacial regions. The dose reduction becomes more significant when middle or small FOV is chosen. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E376 / E380
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HLTH RISKS EXP LOW L
[2]   Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use [J].
Arai, Y ;
Tammisalo, E ;
Iwai, K ;
Hashimoto, K ;
Shinoda, K .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (04) :245-248
[3]  
Barghan Sevin, 2010, J Calif Dent Assoc, V38, P33
[4]   Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms [J].
Delamare, E. L. ;
Liedke, G. S. ;
Vizzotto, M. B. ;
da Silveira, H. L. D. ;
Ribeiro, J. L. D. ;
Silveira, H. E. D. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (07) :414-423
[5]  
Grimard BA, 2009, J PERIODONTOL, V80, P48, DOI [10.1902/jop.2009.080289, 10.1902/jop.2009.080289 ]
[6]   Detection of Vertical Root Fractures in Endodontically Treated Teeth by a Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scan [J].
Hassan, Bassam ;
Metska, Maria Elissavet ;
Ozok, Ahmet Rifat ;
van der Stelt, Paul ;
Wesselink, Paul Rudolf .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2009, 35 (05) :719-722
[7]  
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU), 1989, ICRU Report 44, P189
[8]  
Katheria BC, 2010, PEDIATR DENT, V32, P304
[9]   Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT [J].
Ludlow, J. B. ;
Davies-Ludlow, L. E. ;
Brooks, S. L. ;
Howerton, W. B. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 35 (04) :219-226
[10]   Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology [J].
Ludlow, John B. ;
Ivanovic, Marija .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2008, 106 (01) :106-114