A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-guided FNA with and without a stylet

被引:72
作者
Rastogi, Amit [1 ]
Wani, Sachin [1 ]
Gupta, Neil [1 ]
Singh, Vikas [1 ]
Gaddam, Srinivas [1 ]
Reddymasu, Savio [1 ]
Ulusarac, Ozlem [1 ]
Fan, Fang [1 ]
Romanas, Maria [1 ]
Dennis, Katie L.
Sharma, Prateek [1 ]
Bansal, Ajay [1 ]
Oropeza-Vail, Melissa [1 ]
Olyaee, Mojtaba [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Kansas City, MO 64128 USA
关键词
FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2011.02.015
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Most endosonographers use an EUS needle with an internal stylet during EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA). Reinserting the stylet into the needle after every pass is tedious and time-consuming, and there are no data to suggest that it improves the quality of the cytology specimen. Objective: To compare the samples obtained by EUS-FNA with and without a stylet for (1) the degree of cellularity, adequacy, contamination, and amount of blood and (2) the diagnostic yield of malignancy. Design: Prospective,single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Two tertiary care referral centers. Patients: Patients referred for EUS-FNA of solid lesions. Intervention: Patients underwent EUS-FNA of the solid lesions, and 2 passes each were made with a stylet and without a stylet in the needle. The order of the passes was randomized, and the cytopathologists reviewing the slides were blinded to the stylet status of passes. Main Outcome Measurements: Degree of cellularity, adequacy, contamination, amount of blood, and the diagnostic yield of malignancy in the specimens. Results: A total of 101 patients with 118 lesions were included in final analysis; 236 FNA passes were made, each with and without a stylet. No significant differences were seen in the cellularity (P = .98), adequacy of the specimen (P = .26), contamination (P = .92), or significant amount of blood (P = .61) between specimens obtained with and without a stylet. The diagnostic yield of malignancy was 55 of 236 specimens (23%) in the with-stylet group compared with 66 of 236 specimens (28%) in the without-stylet group (P = .29). Limitations: Endosonographers were not blinded to the stylet status of the passes. Conclusions: Using a stylet during EUS-FNA does not confer any significant advantage with regard to the quality of the specimen obtained or the diagnostic yield of malignancy. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT 01213290). (Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:58-64.)
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 64
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Review of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology [J].
Bardales, RH ;
Stelow, EB ;
Mallery, S ;
Lai, R ;
Stanley, MW .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 34 (02) :140-175
[2]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (01) :1-6
[3]   Stylet Use Does Not Affect Adequacy of Specimen of Pancreatic EUS FNA: A Prospective, Single Blinded, Randomized, Control Trial [J].
Chin, Marcus W. ;
Coss, Alan ;
Mcloughlin, Mark ;
Byrne, Michael F. ;
Enns, Robert A. ;
Telford, Jennifer J. ;
Lam, Eric C. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (05) :AB285-AB285
[4]   The Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) Is Not Affected By Leaving Out the Stylet [J].
Devicente, Noah M. ;
Hawes, Robert ;
Hoffman, Brenda ;
Vela, Stacie A. ;
Romagnuolo, Joseph .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) :AB335-AB335
[5]   EUS-guided FNA [J].
Erickson, RA .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (02) :267-279
[6]   Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration [J].
Klapman, JB ;
Logrono, R ;
Dye, CE ;
Waxman, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (06) :1289-1294
[7]   Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: Sampling, pitfalls, and quality management [J].
Kulesza, Peter ;
Eltoum, Isam A. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 5 (11) :1248-1254
[8]   The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer [J].
Mertz, H ;
Gautam, S .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (01) :33-37
[9]   Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis [J].
Puri, Rajesh ;
Vilmann, Peter ;
Saftoiu, Adrian ;
Skov, Birgit Guldhammer ;
Linnemann, Dorte ;
Hassan, Hazem ;
Garcia, Elymir Soraya Galvis ;
Gorunescu, Florin .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 44 (04) :499-504
[10]   A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet [J].
Sahai, A. V. ;
Paquin, S. C. ;
Gariepy, G. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 42 (11) :900-903