Internalism, Externalism, and the KK Principle

被引：6

作者：

Bird, Alexander ^{[1
]}

Pettigrew, Richard ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Philosophy, Philosophy Bldg, London WC2R 2LS, England

[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Philosophy, Cotham House,Cotham Hill, Bristol BS6 6JL, Avon, England

来源：

ERKENNTNIS | 2021年 / 86卷 / 06期

关键词：

Epistemology; Internalism; Externalism; KK principle; Intensional fallacy;

D O I：

10.1007/s10670-019-00178-3

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

This paper examines the relationship between the KK principle and the epistemological theses of externalism and internalism. In particular we examine arguments from Okasha (Analysis 73(1):80-86, 2013) and Greco (J Philos 111(4):169-197, 2014) which deny that we can derive the denial of the KK principle from externalism.

引用

页码：1713 / 1732

页数：20

共 17 条

[1] [Anonymous], 2004, The externalist challenge
[2] Bird A., 1998, PHILOS SCI, DOI [10.4324/9780203165348, DOI 10.4324/9780203165348]
[3] Bonjour Laurence., 1980, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, V5, P53, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1475-4975.1980.TB00396.X
[4] Higher order ignorance inside the margins
Carter, Sam
[J]. PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2019, 176 (07) : 1789 - 1806
[5] Conee Earl., 2016, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
[6] Transparency and the KK Principle
Das, Nilanjan
Salow, Bernhard
[J]. NOUS, 2018, 52 (01): : 3 - 23
[7] Externalism and modest contextualism
Dretske, F
[J]. ERKENNTNIS, 2004, 61 (2-3) : 173 - 186
[8] Taking a chance on KK
Goodman, Jeremy
Salow, Bernhard
[J]. PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2018, 175 (01) : 183 - 196
[9] COULD KK BE OK?
Greco, Daniel
[J]. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2014, 111 (04) : 169 - 197
[10] Hemp D., 2006, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

← 1 2 →