Classification, genesis, and exploration guides for nonsulfide zinc deposits

被引:200
作者
Hitzman, MW [1 ]
Reynolds, NA
Sangster, DF
Allen, CR
Carman, CE
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Geol & Geol Engn, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] CSA Australia Pty Ltd, Burwood, WA 6100, Australia
[3] Teck Cominco Amer, Spokane, WA 99216 USA
来源
ECONOMIC GEOLOGY AND THE BULLETIN OF THE SOCIETY OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGISTS | 2003年 / 98卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.2113/98.4.685
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Nonsulfide zinc deposits, popularly but incorrectly termed "zinc oxide" deposits, are becoming attractive exploration targets owing to new developments in hydrometallurgy. They are divided into two major geologic types-supergene and hypogene deposits. Supergene deposits are the most common type of nonsulfide zinc deposit and are distributed worldwide. The vast majority occur in carbonate host rocks owing to the high reactivity of carbonate minerals with the acidic, oxidized, zinc-rich fluids derived from the oxidative destruction of sphalerite-bearing sulfide bodies. Formation of these deposits depends upon the size and mineralogy of the preexisting zinc occurrence, vertical displacement of the water table, rate of water table descent through tectonic uplift and/or and climatic conditions, wall-rock fracture density, and a suitable neutralizing trap site. Weathering of Mississippi Valley-type and high-temperature carbonate replacernent-type zinc deposits may generate significant supergene nonsulfide zinc deposits, but the weathering of pyrite-rich, sedimentary exhalative, and volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits is much less likely to form economic supergene zinc deposits. Three subtypes of supergene nonsulfide zinc deposits are recognized-direct replacement, wall-rock replacement, and residual and karst-fill deposits. Hypogene nonsulfide zinc deposits are more poorly known owing to the paucity of examples; however, two major subtypes are recognized: structurally controlled, replacement bodies and manganese-rich, exhalative(?) stratiform bodies. The structurally controlled bodies contain willemite and variable amounts of sphalerite, are hematitic, and are generally associated with hydrothermal dolomitization. Stratiform, manganese-rich, nonsulfide zinc deposits appear to be end members of a spectrum of deposits that include base metal-poor stratiform manganese deposits and sulfide-dominant Broken Hill-type deposits. Hypogene nonsulfide zinc deposits appear to have formed owing to the mixing of a reduced, low- to moderate-temperature (80degrees-200degreesC), zinc-rich, sulfur-poor fluid with an oxidized, sulfur-poor fluid.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 714
页数:30
相关论文
共 156 条
[51]   STRUCTURE AND MINERALOGY OF FRANKLIN ZINC-IRON-MANGANESE DEPOSIT, NEW-JERSEY [J].
FRONDEL, C ;
BAUM, JL .
ECONOMIC GEOLOGY, 1974, 69 (02) :157-180
[52]   GENESIS OF SEDIMENT-HOSTED ZN-PB-BA DEPOSITS IN THE IRANKUH DISTRICT, ESFAHAN AREA, WEST-CENTRAL IRAN [J].
GHAZBAN, F ;
MCNUTT, RH ;
SCHWARCZ, HP .
ECONOMIC GEOLOGY AND THE BULLETIN OF THE SOCIETY OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGISTS, 1994, 89 (06) :1262-1278
[53]  
GREENMAN NN, 1970, AP 11 LUN STUD C NEW, V3, P2155
[54]  
Griffith S., 1956, MIN MAG, V95, P9
[55]  
GROVES I, 2000, ECON GEOL, V98, P797
[56]  
GROVES IM, 2002, MINERALS ENERGY S AU, V25, P6
[57]  
Grubb P.L.C., 1971, J GEOLOGICAL SOC AUS, V18, P165
[58]  
Guillaume C., 1959, NOTES MEMOIRES, V144, P129
[59]  
HAGUE JM, 1956, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V67, P436
[60]  
HALLAM J, 2000, THESIS U MELBOURNE M